E031719 Filed February 5, 2003 Certified for Publication APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, No. RCV 060916, Ben T. Kayashima, Judge. Affirmed. The Greenberg Law Firm, Inc., and Raymond A. Greenberg for Defendant and Appellant James W. Riley. Law Offices of Perry R. Fredgant and Perry R. Fredgant for Defendants and Appellants Sandra L. McGovern, Patricia Anaya and Parthena Yorke. Jones, Bell, Abbott, Fleming Fitzgerald, Trenton J. Hill and Brian G. Mulherin for Plaintiff and
Case No.16-cv-06370-EJD (VKD) 02-04-2019 OPTRONIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Plaintiff, v. NINGBO SUNNY ELECTRONIC CO., LTD., et al., Defendants. VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI United States Magistrate Judge ORDER RE APPLICATION OF CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION Re: Dkt. No. 208 Plaintiff Optronic Technologies ("Orion") moves for an order compelling defendants Ningbo Sunny Electronic Co., Ltd. ("Ningbo Sunny") and Sunny Optics, Inc. ("Sunny Optics") to produce otherwise privileged documents in the possession of defendants'
(a) Separate statement required Except as provided in (b), any motion involving the content of a discovery request or the responses to such a request must be accompanied by a separate statement. The motions that require a separate statement include a motion: (1) To compel further responses to requests for admission; (2) To compel further responses to interrogatories; (3) To compel further responses to a demand for inspection of documents or tangible things; (4) To compel answers at a deposition;