53 Cited authorities

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court

    51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,632 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
  2. Oasis West Realty, LLC v. Goldman

    51 Cal.4th 811 (Cal. 2011)   Cited 1,351 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an attorney "may not do anything which will injuriously affect former client in any matter in which [the attorney] formerly represented [the client]"
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,712 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  4. In re Tobacco II Cases

    46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009)   Cited 1,234 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
  5. Lazar v. Superior Court

    12 Cal.4th 631 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 1,705 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that justifiable reliance is a required element of a fraud claim
  6. Zelig v. County of Los Angeles

    27 Cal.4th 1112 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 974 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding public entity could not be liable under respondeat superior because the plaintiff had failed to allege that the public employees were engaged in conduct within the scope of employment that would render the public employee liable to the plaintiff
  7. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.

    222 Cal.App.3d 1371 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 945 times
    Holding that a claim for breach of the implied covenant may be disregarded if it rests on the same set of facts as a claim for breach of contract
  8. Berryman v. Merit Property Mgt.

    152 Cal.App.4th 1544 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 399 times
    Holding "[u]nder its 'unlawful' prong, the UCL borrows violations of other laws . . . and makes those unlawful practices actionable under the UCL"
  9. Love v. Fire Ins. Exchange

    221 Cal.App.3d 1136 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 572 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding bad faith occurs when the insurer withholds benefits unreasonably or without proper cause
  10. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.

    4 Cal.App.4th 857 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 522 times
    Holding that "intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person"