4 Cited authorities

  1. Wilcox v. Birtwhistle

    21 Cal.4th 973 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 215 times
    Acknowledging that, while not determinative, legislative silence after a court has construed a statute may give rise to an inference of acquiescence or passive approval
  2. Demyer v. Costa Mesa Mobile Home Estates

    36 Cal.App.4th 393 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 15 times

    Docket No. G013481. June 30, 1995. Appeal from Superior Court of Orange County, No. 634768, Greer H. Stroud, Referee, and William F. Rylaarsdam, Judge. COUNSEL Peter L. Recchia and Stephen I. Blanchfill for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Swanson Dowdall, Swanson Gieser and Jim P. Mahacek for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION SILLS, P.J. INTRODUCTION The law governing the consequences for failing to respond to requests for admission may be the most unforgiving in civil procedure. There is no relief

  3. Leach v. Superior Court

    111 Cal.App.3d 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 11 times

    Docket No. 19929. November 7, 1980. COUNSEL Harrison Smith, D.D. Hughmanick, James L. Stoelker, John R. Mullen and Daniel McLoughlin for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Lee A. Lopez for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION PUGLIA, P.J. Petitioners are defendants in a quiet title action pending in the respondent superior court. By this application for a writ of mandate, they seek review of the trial court's order denying their motion to compel responses to interrogatories and for sanctions

  4. Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 5   Cited 22,753 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system