6 Cited authorities

McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.
212 Cal.App.4th 1510 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) Cited 126 times 7 Legal Analyses
Concluding that if no evidence gives rise to a reasonable inference that declarant did not believe his statement or that his belief was unreasonable, the statement is conditionally privileged
County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
102 Cal.App.4th 627 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 70 times
Holding that county social workers are entitled to discretionary act immunity for all negligent foster care placement decisions and negligent supervision of the child in that placement “unless the social worker fails to provide specific services mandated by statute or regulation”
Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational Program
191 Cal.App.4th 289 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 47 times
Concluding that maxims of construction could not override positive indicia of contrary legislative intent to cover public employees for purposes of minimum wage claim in Wage Order 4.
Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.
74 Cal.App.4th 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999) Cited 42 times
Finding that the exclusive remedy provision in the California Worker's Compensation Act barred employee's claim against employer for emotional distress where injury arose in course of her employment and was caused by her employment
Cal Francisco Investment Corp. v. Vrionis
14 Cal.App.3d 318 (Cal. Ct. App. 1971) Cited 15 times
Docket No. 26757. January 14, 1971. Appeal from Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Andrew J. Eyman, Judge. COUNSEL Jackson Schoonbrood and Jay Jackson for Plaintiff and Appellant. Scampini, Mortara Ertola, Scampini, Mortara Harris and Haig A. Harris, Jr., for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION ELKINGTON, J. This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff's action following its election to stand on the first amended complaint without amendment. Following the court's sustaining
Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers
Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 Cited 22,480 times 16 Legal Analyses
Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system

Reply

6 Cited authorities

McGrory v. Applied Signal Technology, Inc.

Concluding that if no evidence gives rise to a reasonable inference that declarant did not believe his statement or that his belief was unreasonable, the statement is conditionally privileged

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

Holding that county social workers are entitled to discretionary act immunity for all negligent foster care placement decisions and negligent supervision of the child in that placement “unless the social worker fails to provide specific services mandated by statute or regulation”

Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational Program

Concluding that maxims of construction could not override positive indicia of contrary legislative intent to cover public employees for purposes of minimum wage claim in Wage Order 4.

Gibbs v. American Airlines, Inc.

Finding that the exclusive remedy provision in the California Worker's Compensation Act barred employee's claim against employer for emotional distress where injury arose in course of her employment and was caused by her employment

Cal Francisco Investment Corp. v. Vrionis

Rule 5 - Serving and Filing Pleadings and Other Papers

Allowing service by filing papers with the court's electronic-filing system