§Why CasetextPricing

Memorandum Points and Authorities

undefined

14 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. City of Sacramento

    234 Cal.App.4th 41 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 408 times
    Holding allegation of "a wrongful arrest or detention, without more, does not" state a claim for violation of the Bane Act

  2. McGill v. Citibank, N.A.

    2 Cal.5th 945 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 236 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding agreement to waive right to seek public injunctive relief violated California law

  3. Shoemaker v. Myers

    52 Cal.3d 1 (Cal. 1990)   Cited 466 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no employee has a vested contractual right ... beyond the time or contrary to the terms and conditions fixed by law"

  4. Serrano v. Priest

    5 Cal.3d 584 (Cal. 1971)   Cited 538 times
    Holding that the structure of the education funding system in California denied students equal protection

  5. Roberts v. Los Angeles County Bar Assn.

    105 Cal.App.4th 604 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 161 times
    Deciding prong-two issue despite trial court's failure to reach it

  6. People v. Ochoa

    248 Cal.App.4th 15 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 33 times

    H041918 06-13-2016 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jack Jerry OCHOA, Defendant and Appellant. Attorney for Defendant and Appellant Jack Jerry Ochoa: J. Frank McCabe, San Francisco, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Appellant. Attorneys for Plaintiff and Respondent The People: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Gerald A Engler, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey M. Laurence, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Rene A. Chacon, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Juliet B

  7. Otay Land Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

    169 Cal.App.4th 556 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Otay, the plaintiff was an owner of real property who brought a declaratory relief action against the liability insurer of the property's former owner regarding the insurer's anticipated coverage with respect to contamination problems at the property.

  8. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.

    79 Cal.App.3d 393 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 91 times
    Recognizing the claim when the security interest was in a limited partnership interest

  9. Shell Oil Co. v. Richter

    52 Cal.App.2d 164 (Cal. Ct. App. 1942)   Cited 121 times
    Stating injunctive relief is remedy, not a cause of action

  10. Award Metals, Inc. v. Superior Court

    228 Cal.App.3d 1128 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 19 times

    Docket No. B053308. March 26, 1991. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. EAC 77122, Theodore D. Piatt, Judge. COUNSEL Tobin, Lucks Goldman and Thomas J. Rafacz for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. Gilbert R. Geilim and Judith A. Powell for Real Party in Interest. OPINION EPSTEIN, J. This petition for writ of mandate seeks relief from the overruling of an employer's demurrer to four causes of action in a complaint brought by its former employee for injuries sustained while

  11. Section 1

    Cal. Const. art. I § 1   Cited 1,083 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing "[a]ll people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights," including the right of "privacy"