§Why CasetextPricing

Declaration

undefined

112 Cited authorities

  1. Camacho v. Bridgeport

    523 F.3d 973 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 1,470 times
    Holding that fees-on-fees must be calculated using the lodestar method

  2. Ketchum v. Moses

    24 Cal.4th 1122 (Cal. 2001)   Cited 1,734 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the party seeking a fee enhancement bears the burden of proof

  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler

    22 Cal.4th 1084 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 1,216 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no error in awarding "prevailing market rate for comparable legal services in San Francisco, where counsel is located" in a case heard in Los Angeles

  4. Iskanian v. CSL Transportation Los Angeles, LLC

    59 Cal.4th 348 (Cal. 2014)   Cited 695 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that arbitration provisions banning class-action litigation or collective arbitration of employment-related claims are enforceable under the NLRA and the FAA's saving clause, but also holding that arbitration provisions banning representative claims under California's Private Attorneys General Act violates that Act

  5. Mangold v. California Public Utilities Com'n

    67 F.3d 1470 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 1,165 times
    Holding that a plaintiff must present their claim in writing before bringing suit

  6. Maria P. v. Riles

    43 Cal.3d 1281 (Cal. 1987)   Cited 1,196 times
    Determining plaintiffs qualified as prevailing parties under § 1021.5 on the basis of their preliminary injunction against defendants

  7. Shahriar v. Smith Wollensky Rest. Grp., Inc.

    659 F.3d 234 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective actions under the FLSA encompass only FLSA violations

  8. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State University

    132 Cal.App.4th 359 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 513 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that failure to consider that payment for the case was deferred for four years in discussion of whether a multiplier was warranted was an abuse of discretion

  9. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior Court

    34 Cal.4th 319 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 514 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that common questions predominated in overtime case brought by chain store managers

  10. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.

    23 Cal.4th 429 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 532 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing and remanding for reconsideration because the court was not "prepared to say that class treatment necessarily is proper," and "upon a fresh look [the trial court] may discern valid reasons for denying" the certification motion

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,166 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party

  12. Section 1021 - Measure and mode of attorney's compensation left to agreement

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1021   Cited 1,179 times
    Providing that a contract may provide for an award of "reasonable attorney's fees"

  13. Section 6-A:5 - Advances From the Treasury

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 6-A:5   Cited 1 times

    Pending the issue of bonds or notes hereunder or in lieu of the issue of notes hereunder, the state treasurer may use any cash in the treasury for the purposes for which the bonds were authorized. Such advances shall be repaid without interest from the proceeds of bonds or notes issued hereunder. RSA 6-A:5 1967, 88:1, eff. April 27, 1967.