City of Hollister v. Monterey Ins. Co.
165 Cal.App.4th 455 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 157 timesHolding that equitable estoppel was applicable in preventing an insurer from asserting a contract provision requiring a certain performance by insured by a certain time, because the insurer had itself caused the delays by its unfair conduct
Dial 800 v. Fesbinder
118 Cal.App.4th 32 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) Cited 140 timesRecognizing that an "interpleader proceeding is traditionally viewed as two lawsuits in one," where the "first dispute is between the stakeholder and the claimants to determine the right to interplead the funds," and the "second dispute to be resolved is who is to receive the interpleaded funds"
Ramos v. Superior Court
28 Cal.App.5th 1042 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018) Cited 55 times 1 Legal AnalysesAddressing employment discrimination action
Camping Const. Co. v. District Council
915 F.2d 1333 (9th Cir. 1990) Cited 56 timesHolding that the district court “itself ruled on the arbitrability question, and concluded that both the termination issue and the repudiation issue were arbitrable.”
Valsan Partners Limited Partnership v. Calcor Space Facility, Inc.
25 Cal.App.4th 809 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) Cited 24 timesDocket No. B077484. June 7, 1994. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. C752786, C. Bernard Kaufman, Judge. COUNSEL Scott E. Wood for Plaintiff and Appellant. Freshman, Marantz, Orlanski, Cooper Klein, Jeffrey L. Davidson and Matthew C. Thompson for Defendant and Respondent. OPINION GODOY PEREZ, J. Plaintiff and appellant Valsan Partners Limited Partnership (Valsan) appeals from the trial court order denying its petition to compel arbitration with defendant and respondent Calcor Space