§Why CasetextPricing

Order Proposed

undefined

25 Cited authorities

  1. State v. Superior Court

    32 Cal.4th 1234 (Cal. 2004)   Cited 1,394 times
    Holding that "failure to allege facts demonstrating or excusing compliance with the claim presentation requirement subjects a claim against a public entity to a demurrer for failure to state a cause of action"

  2. Badie v. Bank of America

    67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 1,292 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution

  3. McKell v. Washington Mutual Inc.

    142 Cal.App.4th 1457 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 711 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a loan transaction is a business practice under the UCL

  4. City of Stockton v. Superior Court

    42 Cal.4th 730 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 670 times
    Holding that contract claims are subject to the CTCA's presentment requirement; adding that the CTCA is better referred to as the Government Claims Act "to reduce confusion"

  5. Romano v. Rockwell Internat., Inc.

    14 Cal.4th 479 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 585 times
    Holding that a FEHA action for discriminatory discharge does not commence until the actual discharge

  6. Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.

    148 Cal.App.4th 97 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 362 times
    Holding a net operating loss as intangible property

  7. C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District

    53 Cal.4th 861 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 217 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that supervisory personnel could be vicariously liable and noting that "public school personnel may be individually liable for their negligent failure to protect students from harm at others' hands"

  8. Red Mntn. v. Fallbrook

    143 Cal.App.4th 333 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 126 times
    Noting court's discretion to disregard party's technical noncompliance under former California Rules of Court, rule 14(e)(C)

  9. People v. Dougherty

    138 Cal.App.3d 278 (Cal. Ct. App. 1982)   Cited 224 times
    Deeming waived appellate contentions that were "bereft of factual underpinning, record references, argument, and/or authority"

  10. Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLC

    231 Cal.App.4th 328 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to aid and abet a breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff must plead that the defendant had actual knowledge of the breach and provided substantial assistance or encouragement in it

  11. Rule 3.1 - Title

    Cal. R. 3.1

    The rules in this title may be referred to as the Civil Rules. Cal. R. Ct. 3.1 Rule 3.1 adopted effective 1/1/2007.