§Why CasetextPricing

Opposition Objections

undefined

7 Cited authorities

  1. Howard v. American Natl. Fire

    187 Cal.App.4th 498 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 164 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the plaintiffs were entitled to prejudgment interest in excess of a policy limit owed by the insurer to indemnify the insured for the plaintiffs' certain judgment

  2. Ladas v. California State Auto. Assn.

    19 Cal.App.4th 761 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 121 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding "fees are not authorized for exhibits not used at trial" under section 1033.5, subdivision

  3. Doe v. Dep't of Children & Family Servs.

    37 Cal.App.5th 675 (Cal. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 36 times
    Filing fees are recoverable as costs

  4. Baker-Hoey v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    111 Cal.App.4th 592 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 43 times

    No. E032995 Filed August 20, 2003 Certified for Publication Appeal from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, No. RCV31496, Ben T. Kayashima, Judge. (Retired Judge of the San Bernardino Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to art VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed. Retired judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. Gibson, Dunn Crutcher, Robert S. Warren, Robert W. Loewen, David A

  5. S. Cal. Sunbelt Developers, Inc. v. Banyan Ltd. P'ship

    8 Cal.App.5th 910 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 13 times   3 Legal Analyses

    G051260 01-19-2017 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SUNBELT DEVELOPERS, INC., Defendant and Appellant, v. BANYAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents. Enterprise Counsel Group, Benjamin P. Pugh and James S. Azadian, Irvine, for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Jonathan P. Chodos and Jonathan P. Chodos, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Respondents. O'LEARY, P.J. Enterprise Counsel Group, Benjamin P. Pugh and James S. Azadian, Irvine, for Defendant and Appellant. Law Offices of Jonathan

  6. Gibson v. Bobroff

    49 Cal.App.4th 1202 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 36 times
    Holding that the "legislation does not foreclose an award of mediation expenses as costs" and that "when an unsuccessful mediation has been court ordered, reasonably necessary expenses incident thereto may, in the sound discretion of the trial court, be awarded after trial to a prevailing party"

  7. Lubetzky v. Friedman

    228 Cal.App.3d 35 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991)   Cited 34 times

    Docket No. B038108. February 20, 1991. Appeal from Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. WEC88335, Sara K. Radin, Judge. COUNSEL Richard Lubetzky, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Mark B. Shragge for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION LILLIE, P.J. Plaintiff Richard Lubetzky appeals from an October 14, 1988, order denying his request for sanctions and denying his motion to tax costs on appeal of defendants Robert Friedman, Erving Friedman, Monica Friedman, and Ariel Ganezer (hereinafter