23 Cited authorities

Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court
51 Cal.4th 310 (Cal. 2011) Cited 1,624 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"
In re Tobacco II Cases
46 Cal.4th 298 (Cal. 2009) Cited 1,230 times 35 Legal Analyses
Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied
Robinson Helicopter Co. v. Dana Corp.
34 Cal.4th 979 (Cal. 2004) Cited 776 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding the "narrow" exception to the economic loss rule is "limited to a defendant's affirmative misrepresentations on which a plaintiff relies and which expose a plaintiff to liability for personal damages."
Intel Corp. v. Hamidi
30 Cal.4th 1342 (Cal. 2003) Cited 458 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "trespass to chattels is not actionable if it does not involve actual or threatened injury" to property and the defendant's actions did not damage or interfere with the operation of the computer systems at issue
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Werner Enters., Inc.
479 F.3d 1099 (9th Cir. 2007) Cited 182 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that plaintiff adequately stated UCL claim by alleging that defendant engaged in intentional interference with plaintiff's employment contracts
Puentes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., Inc.
160 Cal.App.4th 638 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 155 times
Defining "unfair," "unlawful" and "fraudulent" practices under California's UCL
Duronslet v. Kamps
203 Cal.App.4th 717 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 126 times
Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent
Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran
179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 80 times
Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"
Moore v. Apple, Inc.
73 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (N.D. Cal. 2014) Cited 60 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding Plaintiffs sufficiently alleged injury in fact where "Plaintiff allege[d] that Apple's interference with the receipt of her text messages deprived her of the full benefit of her contractual bargain with Verizon Wireless"
Alborzian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
235 Cal.App.4th 29 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 52 times
Holding that "[t]he Rosenthal Act, among other things, explicitly incorporates the FDCPA's standards"

Minute Order

23 Cited authorities

Holding "the standards for establishing standing under section 17204 and eligibility for restitution under section 17203 are wholly distinct"

Holding class representatives had standing to challenge common marketing of cigarettes despite differences in the advertisements or statements on which class members relied

Holding the "narrow" exception to the economic loss rule is "limited to a defendant's affirmative misrepresentations on which a plaintiff relies and which expose a plaintiff to liability for personal damages."

Holding that "trespass to chattels is not actionable if it does not involve actual or threatened injury" to property and the defendant's actions did not damage or interfere with the operation of the computer systems at issue

Holding that plaintiff adequately stated UCL claim by alleging that defendant engaged in intentional interference with plaintiff's employment contracts

Defining "unfair," "unlawful" and "fraudulent" practices under California's UCL

Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent

Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

Finding Plaintiffs sufficiently alleged injury in fact where "Plaintiff allege[d] that Apple's interference with the receipt of her text messages deprived her of the full benefit of her contractual bargain with Verizon Wireless"

Holding that "[t]he Rosenthal Act, among other things, explicitly incorporates the FDCPA's standards"