§Why CasetextPricing

Order Submitted Matter

undefined

10 Cited authorities

  1. Badie v. Bank of America

    67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 1,274 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution

  2. Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of University of California

    162 Cal.App.4th 343 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 135 times
    Holding the "statute of limitations does not begin to run when some members of the public have a suspicion of wrongdoing, but only once the plaintiff has a suspicion of wrongdoing"

  3. Andrews v. Mobile Aire Estates

    125 Cal.App.4th 578 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 104 times
    In Andrews, the interference with tenants' quiet enjoyment was caused by a disruptive tenant who leased the adjacent space in a mobilehome park from the park owner.

  4. Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

    179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 79 times
    Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

  5. George v. Auto. Club of South. California

    201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 47 times
    Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity

  6. Clauson v. Superior Court

    67 Cal.App.4th 1253 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 36 times
    Deciding whether plaintiffs could seek at the pleading stage punitive damages and statutory penalties for unlawful wiretapping

  7. Schaeffer Land Trust v. San Jose City Council

    215 Cal.App.3d 612 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 49 times
    In Schaeffer Land Trust v. San Jose City Council (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 612, 619, footnote 2, this court held that " '[a] point which is merely suggested by... counsel, with no supporting argument or authority, is deemed to be without foundation and requires no discussion.' [Citation.]" (Cf.

  8. South Shore Land Co. v. Petersen

    226 Cal.App.2d 725 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964)   Cited 66 times
    In SouthShore, the parties had presented competing chains of title to establish their individual claims of right to the property at issue.

  9. People v. Boissard

    5 Cal.App.4th 972 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 14 times

    Docket No. E008980. January 15, 1992. Appeal from Superior Court of Riverside County, No. ICR-13766, Eugene R. Bishop and H. Morgan Dougherty, Judges. Judge Bishop heard the motion and accepted defendant's guilty plea and Judge Dougherty placed defendant on formal probation for a period of three years. COUNSEL A. William Bartz, Jr., under appointment by the Court of Appeals, for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Harley

  10. Rule 3.1322 - Motions to strike

    Cal. R. 3.1322   Cited 10 times

    (a) Contents of notice A notice of motion to strike a portion of a pleading must quote in full the portions sought to be stricken except where the motion is to strike an entire paragraph, cause of action, count, or defense. Specifications in a notice must be numbered consecutively. (b) Timing A notice of motion to strike must be given within the time allowed to plead, and if a demurrer is interposed, concurrently therewith, and must be noticed for hearing and heard at the same time as the demurrer