16 Cited authorities

Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (1945) Cited 22,988 times 110 Legal Analyses
Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.
26 Cal.4th 465 (Cal. 2001) Cited 1,245 times 2 Legal Analyses
Restating the same criteria for exceptions from the rule set forth in section 1714
Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court
83 Cal.App.4th 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 664 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that the alter ego doctrine is a mechanism for imposing liability on a parent company for the actions of its subsidiaries whereas single entity liability applies to sister corporations
Duronslet v. Kamps
203 Cal.App.4th 717 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 126 times
Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent
People v. Carson
35 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2005) Cited 145 times
Holding that retrial was required if trial court on remand finds defendant's Faretta right was violated
Gould v. Maryland Sound Industries, Inc.
31 Cal.App.4th 1137 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995) Cited 189 times
Holding that discharge to avoid payment of wages is cognizable in tort as a wrongful discharge
Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran
179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 79 times
Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"
Blanco v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
158 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 76 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding plaintiff's breach of implied warranty claim failed because plaintiff could not allege privity with a heart valve manufacturer
Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.
42 Cal.2d 682 (Cal. 1954) Cited 292 times
Holding that reliance is required absent privity
People v. Morales
25 Cal.App.5th 502 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018) Cited 38 times
Granting section 1473.7 motion of party who pleaded and served time for a crime in 2002

Order Submitted Matter

16 Cited authorities

Restating the same criteria for exceptions from the rule set forth in section 1714

Holding that the alter ego doctrine is a mechanism for imposing liability on a parent company for the actions of its subsidiaries whereas single entity liability applies to sister corporations

Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent

Holding that retrial was required if trial court on remand finds defendant's Faretta right was violated

Holding that discharge to avoid payment of wages is cognizable in tort as a wrongful discharge

Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

Finding plaintiff's breach of implied warranty claim failed because plaintiff could not allege privity with a heart valve manufacturer

Holding that reliance is required absent privity

Granting section 1473.7 motion of party who pleaded and served time for a crime in 2002