16 Cited authorities

Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington
326 U.S. 310 (1945) Cited 23,009 times 110 Legal Analyses
Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )
Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.
26 Cal.4th 465 (Cal. 2001) Cited 1,246 times 2 Legal Analyses
Restating the same criteria for exceptions from the rule set forth in section 1714
Sonora Diamond Corp. v. Superior Court
83 Cal.App.4th 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000) Cited 664 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that the alter ego doctrine is a mechanism for imposing liability on a parent company for the actions of its subsidiaries whereas single entity liability applies to sister corporations
O'Neil v. Crane Co.
53 Cal.4th 335 (Cal. 2012) Cited 203 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding that product manufacturer is not liable under any theory for harm caused by a third party's products
Duronslet v. Kamps
203 Cal.App.4th 717 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 126 times
Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent
Snowney v. Harrah's Entertainment, Inc.
35 Cal.4th 1054 (Cal. 2005) Cited 152 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Snowney, a California resident filed a class action in this state against a group of Nevada hotels, alleging several causes of action related to their purported failure to provide notice of an energy surcharge imposed on hotel guests.
Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran
179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 80 times
Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"
Blanco v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
158 Cal.App.4th 1039 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 76 times 1 Legal Analyses
Finding plaintiff's breach of implied warranty claim failed because plaintiff could not allege privity with a heart valve manufacturer
DVI, Inc. v. Superior Court
104 Cal.App.4th 1080 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 65 times
Holding that personal jurisdiction did not exist even though the defendant company registered to do business in California, had a California agent for service of process, and had two officers residing in California
George v. Auto. Club of South. California
201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 47 times
Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity

Notice Entry of Order

16 Cited authorities

Restating the same criteria for exceptions from the rule set forth in section 1714

Holding that the alter ego doctrine is a mechanism for imposing liability on a parent company for the actions of its subsidiaries whereas single entity liability applies to sister corporations

Holding that product manufacturer is not liable under any theory for harm caused by a third party's products

Holding physician-patient privilege does not apply to nurses or other medical staff working under physician's supervision or acting as physician's agent

In Snowney, a California resident filed a class action in this state against a group of Nevada hotels, alleging several causes of action related to their purported failure to provide notice of an energy surcharge imposed on hotel guests.

Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

Finding plaintiff's breach of implied warranty claim failed because plaintiff could not allege privity with a heart valve manufacturer

Holding that personal jurisdiction did not exist even though the defendant company registered to do business in California, had a California agent for service of process, and had two officers residing in California

Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity