10 Cited authorities

  1. EVON v. LAW OFFICES OF SIDNEY MICKELL

    CIV. NO. S-09-0760 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2010)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses

    CIV. NO. S-09-0760 JAM GGH. February 3, 2010 ORDER GREGORY HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge Previously pending on this court's law and motion calendar for January 28, 2010, was plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses, filed October 29, 2009. Sergei Lemberg appeared telephonically for plaintiff. John Dahlberg represented defendants. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the joint statement, the court now issues the following order. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant action under

  2. Burris v. Versa Prods., Inc.

    Civ. No. 07-3938 (JRT/JJK) (D. Minn. Feb. 19, 2013)   Cited 10 times   3 Legal Analyses

    Civ. No. 07-3938 (JRT/JJK) 02-19-2013 Lowell P. Burris and Joyce P. Burris, Plaintiffs, v. Versa Products, Inc., G and L Products, Inc., and Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company, Defendants. Thomas F. Handorff, Esq., Handorff Law Offices, P.C., counsel for Plaintiffs. Richard A. Lind, Esq., and Matthew D. Sloneker, Esq., Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., counsel for Defendants Versa Products, Inc., and G and L Products, Inc. Nicholas J. O'Connell, Esq., and Thomas A. Gilligan Esq., counsel

  3. Mason v. Ryan

    No. CV 17-08098-PCT-DGC (MHB) (D. Ariz. Apr. 19, 2018)

    No. CV 17-08098-PCT-DGC (MHB) 04-19-2018 Nathan Sterling Mason, Plaintiff, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Defendants. David G. Campbell United States District Judge ORDER Plaintiff Nathan Sterling Mason, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Lewis, Buckley Unit, brought this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC) Director Charles L. Ryan; Correctional Officer (CO) Joshua Baese; Corizon, LLC; and Nurse Practitioner Andreas Thude

  4. IDC Fin. Publ'g, Inc. v. Bonddesk Grp., LLC

    Case No. 15-cv-1085-pp (E.D. Wis. Oct. 26, 2017)   1 Legal Analyses

    Case No. 15-cv-1085-pp 10-26-2017 IDC FINANCIAL PUBLISHING, INC., Plaintiff, v. BONDDESK GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. HON. PAMELA PEPPER United States District Judge ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RESTRICT DOCUMENTS (DKT. NO. 45) AND GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S CIVIL L.R. 7(h) NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO COMPEL (DKT. NO. 46) On September 7, 2017, the plaintiff filed two motions: (1) a Civil L.R. 7(h) expedited, non-dispositive motion to compel production of un-redacted documents, dkt. no

  5. Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. Miller

    13-cv-03936 CW (NC) (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2014)   Cited 1 times

    LIVE NATION MERCHANDISE, INC., Plaintiff, v. STANLEY G. MILLER, and others, Defendants. No. 13-cv-03936 CW (NC). United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division. May 9, 2014. ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE Re: Dkt. Nos. 46, 53 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court are two joint discovery letter briefs, Dkt. Nos. 46, 53, in which defendants and counter-claimants, Stanley Miller and the Alton Kelley and Marguerite Trousdale Kelley 1999 Trust ("Artists")

  6. Kirkland v. Superior Court of Los Angeles

    95 Cal.App.4th 92 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 4 times

    B152121 Filed January 9, 2002 Certified for Publication ORIGINAL PROCEEDING; petition for a writ of mandate, Richard Neidorf, Judge. (Super.Ct. No. SC057503) Petition denied. Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney Priess, Jeffrey J. Christovich, Katherine P. Shannon and Craig S. Berman for Petitioners. O'Melveny Myers, Daniel M. Petrocelli, Robert C. Welsh and Jeffrey A. Barker for Real Party in Interest. No appearance for Respondent. VOGEL (MIRIAM A.), J. The Securities and Exchange Commission conducted

  7. Associated Brewers Distr. Co. v. Superior Court

    65 Cal.2d 583 (Cal. 1967)   Cited 27 times
    In Associated Brewers Distributing Co. v. Superior Court, supra, plaintiff sued to recover a specific sum allegedly due for goods sold and delivered.
  8. Coriell v. Superior Court

    39 Cal.App.3d 487 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)   Cited 6 times

    Docket No. 43847. May 24, 1974. COUNSEL Daniel C. Lavery, Sanford N. Nathan and David Grabill for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. McLaughlin Irvin and Ralph J. Scalzo for Real Party in Interest. OPINION THOMPSON J. The petition for writ of mandate which is here before us raises the validity of a trial court order deferring discovery in the form of interrogatories by the plaintiffs in a class action until after a hearing by the trial court to determine class worthiness, i.e., the constitution

  9. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 95,318 times   656 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
  10. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 15,065 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"