§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Sierra Club, et al., Appellants,v.Village of Painted Post, et al., Respondents.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.

    67 N.Y.2d 400 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 657 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that failure to raise challenges to FEIS under state environmental law during proceedings could not be overlooked when determining whether failure to discuss issue in FEIS was reasonable

  2. City Council v. Town Bd.

    3 N.Y.3d 508 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 46 times
    Distinguishing Matter of Programming & Sys. v. New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 61 N.Y.2d 738

  3. Cross Westchester Dev. Corp. v. Town Board

    141 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)   Cited 12 times

    June 27, 1988 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.). Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further, Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the town board; and it is further, Ordered that the petitioners are awarded one bill of costs. The petitioners applied to the town board to have annexed to the Village of Elmsford 23 acres of land owned by them which were contiguous to the village. The town board, purporting to act

  4. Section 617.2 - Definitions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.2   Cited 416 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Defining “negative declaration” as a “written determination by a lead agency that the implementation of [an] action as proposed will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts”

  5. Section 617.5 - Type II Actions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.5   Cited 153 times   4 Legal Analyses

    (a) Actions or classes of actions identified in subdivision (c) of this section are not subject to review under this Part, except as otherwise provided in this section. These actions have been determined not to have a significant impact on the environment or are otherwise precluded from environmental review under Environmental Conservation Law, article 8. The actions identified in subdivision (c) of this section apply to all agencies. (b) Each agency may adopt its own list of Type II actions to supplement

  6. Section 617.4 - Type I actions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 6 § 617.4   Cited 143 times   2 Legal Analyses

    (a) The purpose of the list of Type I actions in this section is to identify, for agencies, project sponsors and the public, those actions and projects that are more likely to require the preparation of an EIS than Unlisted actions. All agencies are subject to this Type I list. (1) This Type I list is not exhaustive of those actions that an agency determines may have a significant adverse impact on the environment and requires the preparation of an EIS. However, the fact that an action or project