12 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Procter Gamble

    356 U.S. 677 (1958)   Cited 1,681 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although Government suggested dismissal as a sanction for its refusal to comply with a challenged court order, Government could challenge that underlying order in ensuing appeal of dismissal
  2. Williams v. Superior Court

    3 Cal.5th 531 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 228 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"
  3. Forthmann v. Boyer

    97 Cal.App.4th 977 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 134 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Forthmann v. Boyer (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 977, 985, the Court of Appeal implied contestation occurs when objections are filed and rejected a claim that discovery was proper without the filing of an objection.
  4. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court

    56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961)   Cited 291 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.
  5. Advanced Modular Sputtering v. Superior Court

    132 Cal.App.4th 826 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 72 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that one of the purpose of the CCP §2019.210 disclosure is that "it enables defendants to form complete and well-reasoned defenses, ensuring that they need not wait until the eve of trial to effectively defend against charges of trade secret misappropriation"
  6. Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.

    198 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 30 times
    Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act
  7. Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

    168 Cal.App.4th 165 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 24 times
    In Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 165, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 321 (Pratt), the trial court found the defendant's actions "circumvented the established procedures for civil discovery under California law"; granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendant from conducting a disciplinary proceeding or from compelling the plaintiff to attend an extrajudicial medical examination; and awarded sanctions.
  8. Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court

    53 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 33 times
    Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"
  9. Glassdoor, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.

    9 Cal.App.5th 623 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 9 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Applying a "tripartite standard of review"
  10. Davies v. Superior Court

    36 Cal.3d 291 (Cal. 1984)   Cited 33 times
    In Davies, a petitioner sought disclosure of California Highway Patrol accident data, which came under the confidentiality coverage of California Vehicle Code § 20012.
  11. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 16,817 times   106 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"