12 Cited authorities

United States v. Procter Gamble
356 U.S. 677 (1958) Cited 1,691 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that, although Government suggested dismissal as a sanction for its refusal to comply with a challenged court order, Government could challenge that underlying order in ensuing appeal of dismissal
Williams v. Superior Court
3 Cal.5th 531 (Cal. 2017) Cited 237 times 12 Legal Analyses
Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"
Forthmann v. Boyer
97 Cal.App.4th 977 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002) Cited 135 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Forthmann v. Boyer (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 977, 985, the Court of Appeal implied contestation occurs when objections are filed and rejected a claim that discovery was proper without the filing of an objection.
Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court
56 Cal.2d 355 (Cal. 1961) Cited 293 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.
Advanced Modular Sputtering v. Superior Court
132 Cal.App.4th 826 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 72 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that one of the purpose of the CCP §2019.210 disclosure is that "it enables defendants to form complete and well-reasoned defenses, ensuring that they need not wait until the eve of trial to effectively defend against charges of trade secret misappropriation"
Flagship Theatres of Palm Desert, LLC v. Century Theatres, Inc.
198 Cal.App.4th 1366 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011) Cited 30 times
Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act
Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
168 Cal.App.4th 165 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 26 times
In Pratt v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (2008) 168 Cal.App.4th 165, 85 Cal.Rptr.3d 321 (Pratt), the trial court found the defendant's actions "circumvented the established procedures for civil discovery under California law"; granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendant from conducting a disciplinary proceeding or from compelling the plaintiff to attend an extrajudicial medical examination; and awarded sanctions.
Calcor Space Facility, Inc. v. Superior Court
53 Cal.App.4th 216 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) Cited 34 times
Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"
Glassdoor, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.
9 Cal.App.5th 623 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017) Cited 9 times 5 Legal Analyses
Applying a "tripartite standard of review"
Davies v. Superior Court
36 Cal.3d 291 (Cal. 1984) Cited 34 times
In Davies, a petitioner sought disclosure of California Highway Patrol accident data, which came under the confidentiality coverage of California Vehicle Code § 20012.
Rule 45 - Subpoena
Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 Cited 17,328 times 112 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

Response Reply

12 Cited authorities

Holding that, although Government suggested dismissal as a sanction for its refusal to comply with a challenged court order, Government could challenge that underlying order in ensuing appeal of dismissal

Concluding fear of retaliation cuts in favor of "facilitating collective actions so that individual employees need not run the risk of individual suits"

In Forthmann v. Boyer (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 977, 985, the Court of Appeal implied contestation occurs when objections are filed and rejected a claim that discovery was proper without the filing of an objection.

In Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance adjusters and investigators.

Holding that one of the purpose of the CCP §2019.210 disclosure is that "it enables defendants to form complete and well-reasoned defenses, ensuring that they need not wait until the eve of trial to effectively defend against charges of trade secret misappropriation"

Noting federal law's antitrust injury requirement applies to claims under the Cartwright Act

Requesting party bears burden to determine "the manner in which [the responding party] maintains its records"

Applying a "tripartite standard of review"

In Davies, a petitioner sought disclosure of California Highway Patrol accident data, which came under the confidentiality coverage of California Vehicle Code § 20012.

Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"