§Why CasetextPricing

10 Cited authorities

  1. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.

    178 Cal.App.4th 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 325 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that meals are not recoverable under Cal. Civ. P.Code § 1033.5.

  2. Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

    97 Cal.App.4th 132 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 227 times
    In Carver, several dealer-lessees sued Chevron alleging various causes of action, including antitrust violations under the Cartwright Act (Bus. &Prof. Code, § 16720 et seq.).

  3. Sokolow v. County of San Mateo

    213 Cal.App.3d 231 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 112 times
    Discussing apportioning attorney fees between different defendants

  4. Melnyk v. Robledo

    64 Cal.App.3d 618 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976)   Cited 157 times
    Noting that "the trial court . . . is not bound by the itemization claimed in the attorney's affidavit"

  5. Acosta v. SI Corp.

    129 Cal.App.4th 1370 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 56 times
    In Acosta, a group of homeowners jointly sued SI Corporation on a single theory—product liability for an allegedly faulty mesh used in the construction of their homes—and lost.

  6. Michell v. Olick

    49 Cal.App.4th 1194 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that a prevailing party under CCP § 1021 is " entitled to costs as a matter of right; the trial court has no discretion to order each party to bear his or her own costs."

  7. Oak Grove School Dist. v. City Title Ins. Co.

    217 Cal.App.2d 678 (Cal. Ct. App. 1963)   Cited 93 times
    In Oak Grove SchoolDist. v. City Title Ins. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 288] defendants claimed costs and disbursements under Code of Civil Procedure section 1255a after the plaintiff school district abandoned its eminent domain proceeding.

  8. Golf West of Kentucky, Inc. v. Life Investors

    178 Cal.App.3d 313 (Cal. Ct. App. 1986)   Cited 10 times
    In Golf West of Kentucky, Inc. v. Life Investors, Inc. (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 313, 223 Cal.Rptr. 539, superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Cooper v. Westbrook Torrey Hills (2000) 81 Cal.App.4th 1294, 1299–1300, 97 Cal.Rptr.2d 742, the court allocated an appellate cost judgment between two plaintiffs who had sued the defendant under individual franchise agreements and consolidated their cases for trial.

  9. No Oil, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.

    50 Cal.App.3d 8 (Cal. Ct. App. 1975)   Cited 20 times
    In No Oil, Inc. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., supra, 50 Cal.App.3d 8, defendants prevailed at trial and were awarded attorneys' fees jointly and severally against plaintiffs.

  10. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 278 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best