§Why CasetextPricing

Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade, et al., Respondents, The Livery Roundtable, Inc., et al., Intervenors-Respondents,v.Michael R. Bloomberg,, et al., Appellants, Livery Base Owners Inc., et al., Intervenors-Appellants.

Brief

46 Cited authorities

  1. Silverman

    61 N.Y.2d 299 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 564 times
    Noting that an arbitrator's “award will not be vacated even though the court concludes that his interpretation of the agreement misconstrues or disregards its plain meaning or misapplies substantive rules of law, unless it is violative of a strong public policy, or is totally irrational”

  2. Boreali v. Axelrod

    71 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 243 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding proper balance between health concerns and cost "is a uniquely legislative function"

  3. Consumers Union v. State

    5 N.Y.3d 327 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 84 times
    Holding that business judgment rule would protect board of nonprofit reorganizing non-profit health insurer as for profit company

  4. Dorset v. Cultural Resources

    46 N.Y.2d 358 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 123 times
    In Hotel Dorset Co. v. Trust for Cultural Resources, 46 N.Y.2d 358, 385 N.E.2d 1284, 413 N.Y.S.2d 357 (1978), for example, the New York Court of Appeals found that a state statute apparently specifically tailored to provide benefits for the Museum of Modern Art was a general law because it applied to a class, "entry into which was governed by conformity to or compliance with specified conditions."

  5. Wambat Realty Corp. v. State

    41 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 73 times
    Upholding zoning and planning for Adirondack Park region

  6. City of New York v. State

    94 N.Y.2d 577 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 31 times

    Argued February 15, 2000 April 4, 2000 Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Elizabeth I. Freedman, Leonard Koernerm Gail Rubin and Spencer Fisher of counsel), and Richard M. Weinberg, for appellants in the first above-entitled action. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Edward D. Johnson, Preeta D. Bansal and Marion R. Buchbinder of counsel), for respondents in the first above-entitled

  7. Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. City of N.Y

    97 N.Y.2d 378 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 24 times
    Finding a special law constitutional because it expressly stated "the substantial State concern sought to be addressed" and ensured that the law was "rationally related to that concern"

  8. New York City v. Patrolmen's Assn

    89 N.Y.2d 380 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 28 times
    Rejecting alternative application to uphold only part of subject law

  9. 19th St. Assocs. v. State

    79 N.Y.2d 434 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 28 times

    Argued March 26, 1992 Decided May 7, 1992 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Carol E. Huff, J. Jack L. Lester for Barbara Sommerfield and others, appellants. Arthur Silverman and another, appellants, pro se. Jay R. Fialkoff, Charles G. Moerdler and Regan A. Shulman for respondents. Chief Judge WACHTLER. In this case, we consider the constitutionality of a statute that extends protection against eviction to the appellants, who are nonpurchasing

  10. Suffolk Bldrs. Assn v. County

    46 N.Y.2d 613 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 47 times

    Argued February 14, 1979 Decided April 5, 1979 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM R. GEILER, J., PAUL J. BAISLEY, J. Sol Horenstein and John E. Lander for appellants. Howard E. Pachman, County Attorney (Alfred Jackson, Jr., and Leonard J. Shore of counsel), for respondents. FUCHSBERG, J. In a declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs Suffolk County Builders Association and certain individual builders challenge the validity of a schedule

  11. Section 10 - General powers of local governments to adopt and amend local laws

    N.Y. Mun. Home Rule Law § 10   Cited 823 times
    Enumerating powers and limits of local government

  12. Section 71 - Attorney-general authorized to appear in cases involving the constitutionality of an act of the legislature, or a rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto

    N.Y. Exec. Law § 71   Cited 431 times

    1. Whenever the constitutionality of a statute, or a rule or regulation adopted pursuant thereto is brought into question upon the trial, hearing or appeal of any action or proceeding, civil or criminal, in any court of record of original or appellate jurisdiction, and proof of the notice of such constitutional challenge, as required by paragraph one of subdivision (b) of section one thousand twelve of the civil practice law and rules, has not been filed, the court or justice before whom such action

  13. Section 80 - Jurisdiction of commissioner

    N.Y. Transp. Law § 80   Cited 16 times

    1. The jurisdiction, supervision, powers and duties of the commissioner under this chapter shall extend to common carriers, common and contract carriers of passengers by motor vehicle, and common and contract carriers of property by motor vehicle, and to the persons owning, leasing or operating the same. Such jurisdiction does not extend however to any public authority or any subsidiary thereof exercising any power granted under the public authorities law. 2. A person or persons owning or holding

  14. Section 181 - Ordinances to regulate taxicabs and limousines

    N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law § 181   Cited 11 times

    The municipal officers and boards in the several cities, towns and villages of this state now having the authority to enact ordinances, may adopt ordinances regulating: 1. The registration and licensing of taxicabs and may limit the number of taxicabs to be licensed and the county of Westchester may adopt ordinances regulating the registration and licensing of taxicabs and limousines and may limit the number to be licensed; the county of Nassau may adopt ordinances regulating the registration of

  15. Section 15-B - New York city accessible transportation system; New York city transportation disabled committee

    N.Y. Transp. Law § 15-B   Cited 1 times

    1. Definitions. When used in this section: a. "Authority" shall mean the New York city transit authority and its subsidiaries. b. "Committee" shall mean the New York city transportation disabled committee established pursuant to subdivision two of this section. c. "Contractor" shall mean any person, firm, partnership, association, corporation, or any state agency, public authority, political subdivision or municipality of this state which enters into a contract related to the provision of paratransit