34 Cited authorities

Badie v. Bank of America
67 Cal.App.4th 779 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998) Cited 1,290 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution
People ex rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.
24 Cal.4th 415 (Cal. 2000) Cited 569 times
S082325 Filed November 6, 2000 Appeal from Superior Court, San Diego County, No. 702204, Robert J. O'Neill, Judge, Ct.App. 4/1 D031041, Review Granted, 73 Cal.App.4th 1396. DeCuir Somach, Somach, Simmons Dunn, Michael E. Vergara; Blodgett, Makechnie Vetne, John H. Vetne; Landels Ripley Diamond, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes Lerach and Sanford Svetcov for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren and Bill Lockyer, Attorneys General, George Williamson, Roderick E. Walston and Richard M. Frank, Chief
People v. Woodell
17 Cal.4th 448 (Cal. 1998) Cited 381 times
Holding that the record of conviction includes not only the trial court record but also an appellate opinion, at least for nonhearsay purposes
Hendy v. Losse
54 Cal.3d 723 (Cal. 1991) Cited 329 times
Affirming an order sustaining defendants' demurrer without leave to amend when the plaintiff filed an amended complaint omitting harmful allegations from the original unverified complaint
Lackner v. North
135 Cal.App.4th 1188 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 164 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a ski resort has no duty to eliminate or protect a recreational skier from a collision with a participant in a snowboarding race and that the resort had no duty to supervise the race participants as they warmed up on a designated training run prior to a competition
Laird v. Blacker
2 Cal.4th 606 (Cal. 1992) Cited 237 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the legislature expressly intended to disallow tolling under any circumstances not enumerated in the statute
Shopoff & Cavallo LLP v. Hyon
167 Cal.App.4th 1489 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 126 times
Holding that a plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a fiduciary relationship, breach of that duty and damages
Plummer v. Day/Eisenberg, LLP
184 Cal.App.4th 38 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 88 times
Reversing successor attorney's summary judgment against discharged attorney's conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claims
Jocer Enterprises, Inc. v. Price
183 Cal.App.4th 559 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) Cited 85 times
Holding legal disability includes absence from the state
Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran
179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009) Cited 80 times
Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

Minute Order

34 Cited authorities

Holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a "bill stuffer" where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution

Holding that the record of conviction includes not only the trial court record but also an appellate opinion, at least for nonhearsay purposes

Affirming an order sustaining defendants' demurrer without leave to amend when the plaintiff filed an amended complaint omitting harmful allegations from the original unverified complaint

Holding that a ski resort has no duty to eliminate or protect a recreational skier from a collision with a participant in a snowboarding race and that the resort had no duty to supervise the race participants as they warmed up on a designated training run prior to a competition

Holding that the legislature expressly intended to disallow tolling under any circumstances not enumerated in the statute

Holding that a plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a fiduciary relationship, breach of that duty and damages

Reversing successor attorney's summary judgment against discharged attorney's conversion and intentional interference with prospective economic advantage claims

Holding legal disability includes absence from the state

Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"