Apollo Capital Fund Llc. v. Roth Capital Partners, LLC
158 Cal.App.4th 226 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007) Cited 311 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that a securities "placement agent" employed by the issuing company was not liable because the issuing company did not transfer the securities to the plaintiffs
US Ecology, Inc. v. State
129 Cal.App.4th 887 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005) Cited 303 timesHolding that causation is an element of a promissory estoppel claim
In re A.B.
164 Cal.App.4th 832 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 175 timesGranting extension for augmentation in juvenile appeal proceeding under rule 8.416(f), on showing of good cause
Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.
211 Cal.App.4th 230 (Cal. Ct. App. 2012) Cited 144 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that actions to avoid enforcement of contractual rights qualify
Hot Rods, LLC v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corp.
242 Cal.App.4th 1166 (Cal. Ct. App. 2015) Cited 41 times 4 Legal AnalysesIn Hot Rods, the court observed that it was "clear from the entirety of the contract" that a "primary concern" of one party was the property's environmental condition, and the contract accordingly permitted it to conduct diligence and included representations by the counterparty regarding environmental conditions. 196 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 65.
Parker v. Solomon
171 Cal.App.2d 125 (Cal. Ct. App. 1959) Cited 17 timesIn Parker v. Solomon, supra, 171 Cal.App.2d 125, the court expressly stated that it was not discussing or deciding whether the statute of limitations barred a quantum meruit cause of action.
Whittaker v. Otto
188 Cal.App.2d 619 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961) Cited 14 timesHolding that agent's relationship to his principal is essentially fiduciary in character and in dealing with his principal he is bound to principles of good faith and honesty