8 Cited authorities

Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors
48 Cal.4th 32 (Cal. 2010) Cited 326 times 15 Legal Analyses
Finding trails agreement not separate agreement but subsequent activity encompassed in original project
Campbell v. Regents of University of California
35 Cal.4th 311 (Cal. 2005) Cited 373 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding generally that "where an administrative remedy is provided by statute, relief must be sought from the administrative body and this remedy exhausted before the courts will act" without explicitly addressing exhaustion before the Labor Commissioner under section 98.7
Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.
4 Cal.App.4th 857 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992) Cited 518 times
Holding that "intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person"
County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
137 Cal.App.4th 292 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006) Cited 258 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that lead paint manufacturers could incur nuisance liability for their "intentional promotion of the use of lead paint on the interiors of buildings with knowledge of the public health hazard that this would create," but not for their "mere manufacture and distribution of lead paint or their failure to warn of its hazards"
People ex Rel. Lungren v. Superior Court
14 Cal.4th 294 (Cal. 1996) Cited 319 times
Holding that, consistent with the broad protection for drinking water before it comes out of the tap, a defective plumbing fixture was a "source of drinking water."
Kajima/Ray Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
23 Cal.4th 305 (Cal. 2000) Cited 227 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that in California a promise is enforceable absent consideration if the promisor should reasonably expect the promisee to rely on the promise, the promisee does rely on the promise, and injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise
Curcini v. County of Alameda
164 Cal.App.4th 629 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) Cited 105 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Labor Code provisions regarding overtime pay are inapplicable to charter counties
Dodd v. Citizens Bank of Costa Mesa
222 Cal.App.3d 1624 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990) Cited 124 times
Holding that a bank does not owe a duty of care to a noncustomer absent a showing that the noncustomer was an alter ego of, or had personally guaranteed the debts of, the bank's customer

Remittitur Judgment Reversed

8 Cited authorities

Finding trails agreement not separate agreement but subsequent activity encompassed in original project

Holding generally that "where an administrative remedy is provided by statute, relief must be sought from the administrative body and this remedy exhausted before the courts will act" without explicitly addressing exhaustion before the Labor Commissioner under section 98.7

Holding that "intentional infliction of emotional distress is an injury to the person"

Holding that, consistent with the broad protection for drinking water before it comes out of the tap, a defective plumbing fixture was a "source of drinking water."

Holding that in California a promise is enforceable absent consideration if the promisor should reasonably expect the promisee to rely on the promise, the promisee does rely on the promise, and injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise

Holding that Labor Code provisions regarding overtime pay are inapplicable to charter counties

Holding that a bank does not owe a duty of care to a noncustomer absent a showing that the noncustomer was an alter ego of, or had personally guaranteed the debts of, the bank's customer