19 Cited authorities

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,324 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  2. Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc.

    150 F.3d 1217 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 1,140 times
    Holding that pretext is shown if other employees with similar qualifications are treated more favorably
  3. Board of Trustees v. Sweeney

    439 U.S. 24 (1978)   Cited 562 times
    Noting that "the employer's burden is satisfied if he simply `explains what he has done' or `produces evidence of legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons'"
  4. White v. Ultramar, Inc.

    21 Cal.4th 563 (Cal. 1999)   Cited 475 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a single act of retaliatory termination demonstrated that a middle manager "determined corporate policy"
  5. Hersant v. Department of Social Services

    57 Cal.App.4th 997 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 494 times
    Holding that "to avoid summary judgment, an employee claiming discrimination must offer substantial evidence that the employer's stated nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse action was untrue or pretextual, or evidence the employer acted with a discriminatory animus, or a combination of the two, such that a reasonable trier of fact could conclude the employer engaged in intentional discrimination.
  6. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.

    63 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 485 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language of § 12940 does not "support recovery on . . . a private right of action where there has been a specific factual finding that [the alleged] discrimination or harassment actually occurred at the plaintiffs's workplace"
  7. Nadaf-Rahrov v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.

    166 Cal.App.4th 952 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 308 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's failure to engage in the interactive process is an unlawful employment practice . . . only if a reasonable accommodation existed."
  8. Jensen v. Wells Fargo Bank

    85 Cal.App.4th 245 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 361 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the critical question in a failure-to-accommodate case is "whether the informal process broke down, and, if so, which party was responsible"
  9. Avila v. Continental Airlines, Inc.

    165 Cal.App.4th 1237 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 252 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that calling in sick during an absence and providing hospital forms describing the illness upon return to work is sufficient notice
  10. Wilson v. County of Orange

    169 Cal.App.4th 1185 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 229 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding employer engaged in interactive process because employee got "exactly what she wanted—albeit after a series of temporary accommodations"
  11. Section 11068 - Reasonable Accommodation

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 11068   Cited 83 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting or extending a leave may be a reasonable accommodation "provided that the leave is likely to be effective in allowing the employee to return to work at the end of the leave ...."
  12. Section 7297.2 - Right to Reinstatement: Guarantee of Reinstatement; Refusal to Reinstate; Permissible Defenses. [Renumbered]

    Cal. Code Regs. tit. 2 § 7297.2   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 2, § 7297.2 1. New section filed 2-9-93; operative 3-11-93 (Register 93, No. 7). 2. Amendment of section heading, section and NOTE filed 7-13-95; operative 8-12-95 (Register 95, No. 28). 3. Editorial correction of subsection (a) (Register 95, No. 44). 4. Change without regulatory effect renumbering former section 7297.2 to new section 11089 filed 10-3-2013 pursuant to section 100, title 1, California Code of Regulations (Register 2013, No. 40). Note: Authority cited: Sections