§Why CasetextPricing

Motion New Trial

undefined

2 Cited authorities

  1. Trujillo v. North County Transit Dist.

    63 Cal.App.4th 280 (Cal. Ct. App. 1998)   Cited 485 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the statutory language of § 12940 does not "support recovery on . . . a private right of action where there has been a specific factual finding that [the alleged] discrimination or harassment actually occurred at the plaintiffs's workplace"

  2. Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente Internat.

    151 Cal.App.4th 1102 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 275 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiff may establish prima facie case "by producing evidence of nothing more than the proximity in time between the protected action and the allegedly retaliatory employment decision"