§Why CasetextPricing

Hearing Demurrer

undefined

9 Cited authorities

  1. Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

    221 Cal.App.4th 49 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013)   Cited 411 times
    Holding loan service providers do not owe a plaintiff a duty of care when considering a loan modification application

  2. People v. Woodell

    17 Cal.4th 448 (Cal. 1998)   Cited 381 times
    Holding that the record of conviction includes not only the trial court record but also an appellate opinion, at least for nonhearsay purposes

  3. County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

    137 Cal.App.4th 292 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 258 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that lead paint manufacturers could incur nuisance liability for their "intentional promotion of the use of lead paint on the interiors of buildings with knowledge of the public health hazard that this would create," but not for their "mere manufacture and distribution of lead paint or their failure to warn of its hazards"

  4. Align Technology, Inc. v. Tran

    179 Cal.App.4th 949 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 80 times
    Holding "legislative purpose of former section 439, the predecessor of section 426.30 . . . was to provide for the settlement, in a single action, of all conflicting claims between the parties arising out of the same transaction" and to "avoid a multiplicity of actions"

  5. San Francisco Unified School Dist. v. W.R. Grace

    37 Cal.App.4th 1318 (Cal. Ct. App. 1995)   Cited 115 times
    Finding that presence of asbestos products in buildings did not satisfy damage element of negligence cause of action when products had not contaminated buildings by releasing friable asbestos

  6. George v. Auto. Club of South. California

    201 Cal.App.4th 1112 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 47 times
    Applying rule, but finding no ambiguity

  7. Trustees of Capital Wholesale v. Shearson Lehman

    221 Cal.App.3d 617 (Cal. Ct. App. 1990)   Cited 29 times
    Dismissing claim for breach of the implied covenant without leave to amend where plaintiff failed to allege facts to support such claim

  8. South Shore Land Co. v. Petersen

    226 Cal.App.2d 725 (Cal. Ct. App. 1964)   Cited 66 times
    In SouthShore, the parties had presented competing chains of title to establish their individual claims of right to the property at issue.

  9. Anthony v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.

    25 Cal.App.3d 442 (Cal. Ct. App. 1972)   Cited 45 times
    Denying loss of bargain damages in negligence