§Why CasetextPricing

Motorola Credit Corporation, Appellant-Respondent, Nokia Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter- Defendant, Motorola, Inc., et al., Counter-Defendants,v.Standard Chartered Bank, Respondent-Appellant, Murat Hakan Uzan, et al., Defendants-Counter- Claimants, Kemal Uzan, et al., Defendants.

Brief

66 Cited authorities

  1. Daimler AG v. Bauman

    571 U.S. 117 (2014)   Cited 5,958 times   238 Legal Analyses
    Holding that foreign corporations may not be subject to general jurisdiction "whenever they have an in-state subsidiary or affiliate"

  2. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Oper. v. Brown

    564 U.S. 915 (2011)   Cited 5,484 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Holding "the sales of petitioners' tires sporadically made in North Carolina through intermediaries" insufficient to support general jurisdiction

  3. Walden v. Fiore

    571 U.S. 277 (2014)   Cited 4,532 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, for specific jurisdiction, "the relationship must arise out of contacts that the 'defendant [it]self' creates with the forum State" (quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 475 (1985))

  4. Helicopteros Nacionales de Colom. v. Hall

    466 U.S. 408 (1984)   Cited 9,414 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “purchases, even if occurring at regular intervals” were insufficient to establish general personal jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation

  5. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 11,010 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

  6. Asahi Metal Indus. Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court

    480 U.S. 102 (1987)   Cited 4,950 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in suit by Taiwanese manufacturer for indemnification against Japanese manufacturer, the assertion by California court of personal jurisdiction over Japanese manufacturer was unreasonable

  7. Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington

    326 U.S. 310 (1945)   Cited 23,015 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Holding that states may exercise personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants with "certain minimum contacts with [the forum] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’ " (quoting Milliken v. Meyer , 311 U.S. 457, 463, 61 S.Ct. 339, 85 L.Ed. 278 (1940) )

  8. Shaffer v. Heitner

    433 U.S. 186 (1977)   Cited 3,209 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, once a judgment is validly rendered against a debtor, the judgment creditor may sue to satisfy the debt with property in a state that lacks personal jurisdiction over the judgment debtor

  9. F. Hofpmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.

    542 U.S. 155 (2004)   Cited 212 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding domestic effects exception does not apply where "price-fixing conduct significantly and adversely affects both customers outside the United States and customers within the United States, but the adverse foreign effect is independent of any adverse domestic effect"

  10. Matter Allstate

    81 N.Y.2d 219 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 697 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "there is no conflict between New York and New Jersey law," and that even if there were a conflict, "New Jersey law [would] govern"

  11. Section 4102 - Recognition of foreign defamation judgments

    28 U.S.C. § 4102   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) FIRST AMENDMENT CONSIDERATIONS.- (1) IN GENERAL.-Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, a domestic court shall not recognize or enforce a foreign judgment for defamation unless the domestic court determines that- (A) the defamation law applied in the foreign court's adjudication provided at least as much protection for freedom of speech and press in that case as would be provided by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States and by the constitution and

  12. Section 3101 - Definitions

    12 U.S.C. § 3101   Cited 37 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Defining "Federal branch" as "a branch of a foreign bank established and operating under [ 12 U.S.C. § 3102]"

  13. Section 134 - Repayment of deposits standing in the names of minors, trustees or joint depositors; repayment where adverse claim is asserted; interpleader in certain actions; effect of claims or advices originating in, and statutes, rules or regulations purporting to be in force in occupied territories

    N.Y. Banking Law § 134   Cited 38 times

    1. Any minor may endorse a check payable to his order for the purpose of depositing the proceeds in a deposit in his name and when any deposit shall be made by or in the name of any minor, the same shall be held for the exclusive right and benefit of such minor, and free from the control or lien of all other persons, except creditors, and shall be paid, together with the interest thereon to the person or upon the order by check or otherwise of the person in whose name the deposit shall stand, and

  14. Section 601 - Authorization; conditions and regulations

    12 U.S.C. § 601   Cited 31 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Any national banking association possessing a capital and surplus of $1,000,000 or more may file application with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for permission to exercise, upon such conditions and under such regulations as may be prescribed by the said board, the following powers: First. To establish branches in foreign countries or dependencies or insular possessions of the United States for the furtherance of the foreign commerce of the United States, and to act if required

  15. Section 9-304 - Law Governing Perfection and Priority of Security Interests in Deposit Accounts

    N.Y. U.C.C. Law § 9-304   Cited 22 times

    (a) Law of bank's jurisdiction governs. The local law of a bank's jurisdiction governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in a deposit account maintained with that bank. (b) Bank's jurisdiction. The following rules determine a bank's jurisdiction for purposes of this part: (1) If an agreement between the bank and its customer governing the deposit account expressly provides that a particular jurisdiction is the bank's jurisdiction for purposes

  16. Section 204-A - Payment of claims by foreign banking corporations where adverse claim is asserted; effect of claims or advices originating in, and statutes, rules or regulations purporting to be in force in occupied territory; performance of contracts and repayment of deposits performable or repayable at foreign offices of foreign banking corporations

    N.Y. Banking Law § 204-A   Cited 3 times

    1. Notice to any foreign banking corporation doing business in this state under a license issued by the superintendent in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, of an adverse claim to a credit standing on its books to the account of any person, or to the balance in any deposit account, or of an adverse claim to securities or other property held for the account of any person, shall not be effectual in this state to cause said foreign banking corporation to recognize said adverse claimant

  17. Section 9.1 - Statement of policy

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 3 § 9.1

    In enacting section three of chapter one of the Laws of 1994, the Legislature has found and declared that certain consumers residing in this State may be unable to afford, without undue financial hardship, the cost of maintaining a consumer transaction account at a banking institution located in this State. Consequently, as provided in section 14-f of the Banking Law, it is the policy of this State that, consistent with safe and sound banking practices, banking institutions shall make available lower

  18. Section 323.1 - Explanation

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 3 § 323.1

    Section 202-a (1)(c) of the Banking Law permits a licensed agency of a foreign banking corporation to accept deposits other than from citizens or residents of the United States as the superintendent shall define. The purpose of this Part is to define the term residents of the United States as used therein, and to provide for appropriate disclosures as to the uninsured status of such deposits. Unlike large-denomination obligations which may be issued to corporations and other business entities pursuant