39 Cited authorities

  1. Mathews v. Eldridge

    424 U.S. 319 (1976)   Cited 13,469 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the degree of process required depends in part on the protected interest at stake
  2. Board of Regents v. Roth

    408 U.S. 564 (1972)   Cited 13,346 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a public employee's appointment terminated on a particular date and there was no provision for renewal after that date, the employee "did not have a property interest sufficient to require . . . a hearing when [the officials] declined to renew his contract of employment."
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill

    470 U.S. 532 (1985)   Cited 6,256 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a 9-month delay in final decision was not "unconstitutionally lengthy per se "
  4. Goldberg v. Kelly

    397 U.S. 254 (1970)   Cited 4,671 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding an individual's interest in continued receipt of government benefits is a property interest protected by the Due Process Clause
  5. Matter of Featherstone v. Franco

    95 N.Y.2d 550 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 361 times
    Noting that the Appellate Division lacks “interest of justice jurisdiction in reviewing the penalty imposed by the Authority” and that reconsideration of the sanction is appropriate only if the penalty “shocks the judicial conscience and, therefore, constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law”
  6. Matter of Field Delivery Serv

    66 N.Y.2d 516 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 358 times
    Stating that agency decision "which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious"
  7. Arons v. Jutkowitz

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9309 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 180 times
    Holding that state law allowing ex parte interviews did not conflict with HIPAA
  8. Matter Gould v. Board of Educ

    81 N.Y.2d 446 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 176 times
    Finding tenure by estoppel based on "petitioner's continuing service as a teacher in the District's employ"
  9. Matter Simpson v. Wolansky

    38 N.Y.2d 391 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 211 times

    Argued November 17, 1975 Decided December 22, 1975 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, MORTON B. SILBERMAN, J. William P. Volin for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Margey Reifler, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, David H. Berman and Jesse J. Fine of counsel), for respondent. COOKE, J. Petitioner Carlisle Simpson, a permanent employee of the Department of Mental Hygiene serving as a ward aide at Letchworth Village, was charged with misconduct

  10. Matter of Hecht v. Monaghan

    121 N.E.2d 421 (N.Y. 1954)   Cited 214 times
    In Matter of Hecht v. Monaghan (307 N.Y. 461, 470) we stated: "The hearing held by an administrative tribunal acting in judicial or quasi-judicial capacity may be more or less informal.