8 Cited authorities

Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Glob. Grp., L.P.
541 U.S. 567 (2004) Cited 2,122 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party's post-filing change in citizenship cannot cure a lack of diversity jurisdiction from the lawsuit's outset
Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders
437 U.S. 340 (1978) Cited 4,391 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."
Makarova v. U.S.
201 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 3,946 times
Holding that legal issues presented by Rule 12(b) motion are reviewed de novo
Palazzo ex rel Delmage v. Corio
232 F.3d 38 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 633 times
Holding that where the deponent's responses were ambiguous, subsequent clarification by affidavit was permissible
Universal Licensing Corp. v. Paola Del Lungo
293 F.3d 579 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 227 times
Holding that plaintiffs incorporation abroad destroyed diversity jurisdiction in suit against fully foreign Italian defendants even though plaintiff may have had its principal place of business in New Jersey
In re Welspun Litig.
16 CV 6792 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 20, 2019) Cited 9 times
Explaining that the stream of commerce theory survived Nicastro because there was no majority opinion in that case, and courts are therefore obliged to follow Justice Breyer's concurrence
Greenblatt v. Gluck
265 F. Supp. 2d 346 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) Cited 25 times
Stating that "pro se status does not exempt a party from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law."
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,916 times 653 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Abraham v. Leigh et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding that a party's post-filing change in citizenship cannot cure a lack of diversity jurisdiction from the lawsuit's outset

Holding that that the production of putative class members' names pursuant to Federal Rule 26 was not "within the scope of legitimate discovery."

Holding that legal issues presented by Rule 12(b) motion are reviewed de novo

Holding that where the deponent's responses were ambiguous, subsequent clarification by affidavit was permissible

Holding that plaintiffs incorporation abroad destroyed diversity jurisdiction in suit against fully foreign Italian defendants even though plaintiff may have had its principal place of business in New Jersey

Explaining that the stream of commerce theory survived Nicastro because there was no majority opinion in that case, and courts are therefore obliged to follow Justice Breyer's concurrence

Stating that "pro se status does not exempt a party from compliance with relevant rules of procedural and substantive law."

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37