23 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 174,208 times   246 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations must "allow[] the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged"
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 191,405 times   329 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint must plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face"
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

    444 U.S. 286 (1980)   Cited 9,618 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma
  4. Lentell v. Merrill Lynch Co., Inc.

    396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 844 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to prove loss causation, a plaintiff must allege "that the misstatement or omission concealed something from the market that, when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the security"
  5. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC

    616 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 407 times
    Holding that exercise of personal jurisdiction is reasonable where, inter alia, forum state has an interest "in providing effective means of redress for its residents"
  6. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez

    305 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 306 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law firm's marketing efforts in New York supported finding personal jurisdiction over a claim arising out of the firm's New York-directed engagement
  7. In re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation

    586 F. Supp. 2d 148 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that Stoneridge did not preclude § 10(b) liability for a Senior Vice President at Bristol Myers
  8. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Straub

    921 F. Supp. 2d 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 46 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the Second Circuit has consistently held that the minimum-contacts test in such circumstances looks to contacts with the entire United States rather than with the forum state"
  9. In re Braskem S.A. Sec. Litig.

    246 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)   Cited 35 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a list of reasons for the low price the defendant had paid for a good was plausibly misleading because it omitted a "key factor, the bribery-affected side deal" with the supplier and therefore amounted to "a classic half-truth"
  10. In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Sec. Litig.

    277 F. Supp. 3d 600 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)   Cited 34 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that aspirational statements about a code of conduct in this context were material because "they were made in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company's integrity, specifically with respect to bribery, during a time of concern"
  11. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 29,825 times   239 Legal Analyses
    Requiring Plaintiffs to "state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud"
  12. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 5,785 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party