22 Cited authorities

Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (2009) Cited 252,377 times 279 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (2007) Cited 266,313 times 365 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
444 U.S. 286 (1980) Cited 10,825 times 32 Legal Analyses
Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma
Lentell v. Merrill Lynch Co., Inc.
396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005) Cited 998 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that to prove loss causation, a plaintiff must allege "that the misstatement or omission concealed something from the market that, when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the security"
Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC
616 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2010) Cited 787 times
Holding that a defendant's conduct was purposefully directed toward New York because the defendant offered bags for sale on its website to New York customers and shipped at least one bag to a New York customer
Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez
305 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 421 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court adopted "too narrow of a view" of the relevant contacts with respect to specific jurisdiction, reasoning that, although the contacts "may not have directly given rise to the plaintiff's cause of action, they certainly 'relate to' it"
In re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities Litigation
586 F. Supp. 2d 148 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) Cited 124 times
Holding that Stoneridge did not preclude § 10(b) liability for a Senior Vice President at Bristol Myers
In re Banco Bradesco S.A. Sec. Litig.
277 F. Supp. 3d 600 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Cited 75 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a complaint adequately pled an individual's knowledge of a bribery scheme by alleging that the defendant attended meetings where "illicit dealings [were] being discussed"
In re Braskem S.A. Sec. Litig.
246 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Cited 65 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a list of reasons for the low price the defendant had paid for a good was plausibly misleading because it omitted a "key factor, the bribery-affected side deal" with the supplier and therefore amounted to "a classic half-truth"
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Straub
921 F. Supp. 2d 244 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) Cited 64 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding "[d]efendants knew or had reason to know that any false or misleading financial reports would be given to prospective American purchasers of those securities"
Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters
Fed. R. Civ. P. 9 Cited 38,894 times 316 Legal Analyses
Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"
Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation
15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 Cited 7,460 times 48 Legal Analyses
Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party

DoubleLine Capital LP et al v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd et al

22 Cited authorities

Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable

Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "

Holding that an Oklahoma court could not exercise personal jurisdiction over a car retailer when the retailer's only connection to Oklahoma was the fact that a car sold in New York became involved in an accident in Oklahoma

Holding that to prove loss causation, a plaintiff must allege "that the misstatement or omission concealed something from the market that, when disclosed, negatively affected the value of the security"

Holding that a defendant's conduct was purposefully directed toward New York because the defendant offered bags for sale on its website to New York customers and shipped at least one bag to a New York customer

Holding that the district court adopted "too narrow of a view" of the relevant contacts with respect to specific jurisdiction, reasoning that, although the contacts "may not have directly given rise to the plaintiff's cause of action, they certainly 'relate to' it"

Holding that Stoneridge did not preclude § 10(b) liability for a Senior Vice President at Bristol Myers

Holding that a complaint adequately pled an individual's knowledge of a bribery scheme by alleging that the defendant attended meetings where "illicit dealings [were] being discussed"

Holding that a list of reasons for the low price the defendant had paid for a good was plausibly misleading because it omitted a "key factor, the bribery-affected side deal" with the supplier and therefore amounted to "a classic half-truth"

Holding "[d]efendants knew or had reason to know that any false or misleading financial reports would be given to prospective American purchasers of those securities"

Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"

Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party