§Why CasetextPricing

Sharp Corporation et al v. Hisense USA Corporation et al

REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Stay MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay the Action /Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay the Action [Public Redacted Version]

39 Cited authorities

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal.

    137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017)   Cited 2,287 times   135 Legal Analyses
    Holding plaintiffs had failed to establish personal jurisdiction over defendants in California in part because they "did not allege that they obtained [the drug at issue] through California physicians or from any other California source; nor did they claim that they were injured by [that drug] or were treated for their injuries in California"

  2. Blum v. Yaretsky

    457 U.S. 991 (1982)   Cited 2,911 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that nursing home is not a state actor in part because provision of nursing home services is not a traditional and exclusive sovereign function

  3. Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson

    538 U.S. 468 (2003)   Cited 535 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a now-private corporation could not assert sovereign immunity in a suit involving events that occurred when the entity was owned by a foreign sovereign

  4. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L'Antisemitisme

    433 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2006)   Cited 990 times
    Holding that "the 'brunt' of the harm need not be suffered in the forum state" and "[i]f a jurisdictionally sufficient amount of harm is suffered in the forum state, it does not matter that even more harm might have been suffered in another state"

  5. Shelley v. Kraemer

    334 U.S. 1 (1948)   Cited 1,705 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state court injunction to enforce a racially restrictive covenant against parties who did not wish to discriminate is state action

  6. Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya

    294 F.3d 82 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 288 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs' allegations of abuse did not amount to the allegations of torture required by § 1605 to survive a motion to dismiss

  7. Karaha Bodas v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak

    335 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 201 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a dispute stemming from an international arbitration under the Convention was not mooted by an Indonesian court’s annulment of the arbitral award because "as long as there is some interest in the outcome for which effective relief is available, the case is not moot"

  8. Livnat v. Palestinian Auth.

    851 F.3d 45 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 102 times
    Finding that the outer boundaries of Rule 4(k) are equivalent to those found in the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment

  9. Termorio v. Electranta

    487 F.3d 928 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 126 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that there was "no cause of action" to confirm award that had been "lawfully nullified by the country in which the award was made"

  10. Davis v. Prudential Securities, Inc.

    59 F.3d 1186 (11th Cir. 1995)   Cited 131 times
    Holding arbitration is a private, voluntary proceeding that does not constitute state action

  11. Section 1603 - Definitions

    28 U.S.C. § 1603   Cited 1,399 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that a state "includes [its] political subdivision"

  12. Section 12 - Notice of motions to vacate or modify; service; stay of proceedings

    9 U.S.C. § 12   Cited 912 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a motion to vacate must be served on the adverse party "within 3 months after the award is filed or served"