6 Cited authorities

  1. Bank of Waunakee v. Rochester Cheese Sales

    906 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 972 times
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration performs a valuable function where the court has patently misunderstood a party, has made a decision outside the adversarial issues presented, or has made an error not of reasoning but of apprehension
  2. Santamarina v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

    466 F.3d 570 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 263 times
    Holding that transferee judge was permitted to reconsider order denying remand by transferor judge
  3. Cenage Learning, Inc. v. Buckeye Books

    531 F. Supp. 2d 596 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)   Cited 10 times

    No. 07 Civ. 8540(CM)(THK). January 16, 2008. Aaron Panayiotis Georghiades, Cozen O'Connor, New York City, for Plaintiff. William Alexander Simon, III, McGarry Simon, New York City, Neil B.Mooney, The Mooney Law Firm, LLC, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANTS McMAHON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Thomson, Wiley, Pearson and McGraw Hill are all distinguished publishers of textbooks. The

  4. Www.Turnstiles.Us, Inc. v. Modular Sec. Sys., Inc.

    Civil Action No. 15-CV-01806-RM-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2015)

    Civil Action No. 15-CV-01806-RM-MEH 12-15-2015 WWW.TURNSTILES.US, INC., Plaintiff, v. MODULAR SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. Judge Raymond P. Moore ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Modular Security Systems, Inc.'s ("MSSI") motion to stay discovery and other due dates ("Motion") (ECF No. 24) pending the Court's resolution of Defendant's Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (ECF No. 9). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion

  5. Sanders v. City of Indianapolis

    1:09-cv-0622-SEB-JMS (S.D. Ind. Apr. 2, 2010)   Cited 2 times
    Noting increasing frequency of discovery stays in cases where dismissal motion raises substantial argument that plaintiff has no legally cognizable claims
  6. Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 1   Cited 11,371 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the Rules of Civil Procedure "should be construed, administered, and employed by the court and the parties to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding."