8 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,081 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Holifield v. Reno
115 F.3d 1555 (11th Cir. 1997) Cited 1,960 times
Holding that in order to make a valid comparison as part of her prima facie case, the plaintiff must show that she and the comparator are "similarly situated in all relevant respects"
McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale
333 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2003) Cited 970 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that use of pepper spray was reasonable when officer "had probable cause to believe that McCormick had committed a violent felony" and "could have reasonably determined that McCormick still posed a threat of further violence"
Cordoba v. Dillard's, Inc.
419 F.3d 1169 (11th Cir. 2005) Cited 675 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim "built ... from language in our own opinions" was not frivolous
Justofin v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
372 F.3d 517 (3d Cir. 2004) Cited 159 times
Holding that insured's knowledge was a question for the trier of fact when insured provided only partial information but the necessity of disclosure was ambiguous
Dehart v. Horn
390 F.3d 262 (3d Cir. 2004) Cited 131 times
Holding that a prison's denial of a Buddhist diet was reasonably related to the prison's legitimate penological interest in efficient food provision
Glaser v. Gap Inc.
994 F. Supp. 2d 569 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) Cited 15 times
No. C11–6679 TSZ. 2014-01-31 William GLASER, Plaintiff, v. GAP INC. and Milinda Mejorado, Defendants. Helen G. Ullrich, Stephen Bergstein, Bergstein & Ullrich, LLP, Chester, NY, for Plaintiff. Andriette Aleigha Roberts, Melissa C. Rodriguez, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants. THOMAS S. ZILLY Helen G. Ullrich, Stephen Bergstein, Bergstein & Ullrich, LLP, Chester, NY, for Plaintiff. Andriette Aleigha Roberts, Melissa C. Rodriguez, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY, for
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,543 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Maldonado v. Federal Express Corporation

8 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that in order to make a valid comparison as part of her prima facie case, the plaintiff must show that she and the comparator are "similarly situated in all relevant respects"

Holding that use of pepper spray was reasonable when officer "had probable cause to believe that McCormick had committed a violent felony" and "could have reasonably determined that McCormick still posed a threat of further violence"

Holding that a claim "built ... from language in our own opinions" was not frivolous

Holding that insured's knowledge was a question for the trier of fact when insured provided only partial information but the necessity of disclosure was ambiguous

Holding that a prison's denial of a Buddhist diet was reasonably related to the prison's legitimate penological interest in efficient food provision

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit