§Why CasetextPricing

Maldonado v. Federal Express Corporation

Opposition to Motion re MOTION to Strike 128 Notice

5 Cited authorities

  1. Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Co.

    206 F.3d 271 (3d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,766 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the timing of appellant's termination was suggestive of causation for both the retaliation and the quid pro quo claims

  2. EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.

    618 F.3d 253 (3d Cir. 2010)   Cited 397 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts need not strike contradictory errata revisions "if sufficiently persuasive reasons are given, if the proposed amendments truly reflect [the original testimony], or if other circumstances" justify the amendments

  3. Cave v. Saxon Mortg. Servs., Inc.

    Civ. A. No. 11-4586 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 19, 2015)   Cited 3 times

    Civ. A. No. 11-4586 Civ. A. No. 12-5366 10-19-2015 LISA and SCOTT CAVE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. WILLIAM D. CAVE, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Padova, J. MEMORANDUM Padova, J. Presently before the Court is a Motion by Plaintiffs to exclude the Report of Defendant Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.'s expert witness Marsha J. Courchane

  4. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,784 times   651 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  5. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,057 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely