§Why CasetextPricing

Liqwd, Inc. et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al

RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS

6 Cited authorities

  1. Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. Am. Radiator

    540 F.2d 102 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 616 times
    Holding that the inquiry into the proper fee should not "assume massive proportions . . . dwarfing the case in chief."

  2. Venetec International, Inc. v. Nexus Medical, LLC

    541 F. Supp. 2d 612 (D. Del. 2008)   Cited 81 times
    Explaining that "[t]he purpose of judgment on the pleadings is to dispose of claims where the material facts are undisputed and judgment can be entered [only] on the competing pleadings and exhibits thereto, and documents incorporated by reference"

  3. Salamone v. Carter's Retail, Inc.

    Civil Action No. 09-5856 (FLW) (D.N.J. Mar. 9, 2012)   Cited 9 times

    Civil Action No. 09-5856 (FLW) 03-09-2012 MARYJO SALAMONE, Plaintiff, v. CARTER'S RETAIL, INC.., Defendant. Freda L. Wolfson NOT FOR PUBLICATION OPINION WOLFSON, United States District Judge: Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Maryjo Salamone's ("Plaintiff") appeal of the Magistrate Judge's September 7, 2011 Order in which he granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery as untimely and lacking good cause. Plaintiff was employed as a manager by Carter's Retail Inc

  4. Pressley v. E. Dist. Precinct

    Civ. No. 09-3215 (WJM) (D.N.J. Oct. 23, 2015)   Cited 1 times

    Civ. No. 09-3215 (WJM) 10-23-2015 DORIAN PRESSLEY, Plaintiff, v. EAST DISTRICT PRECINCT, et al., Defendant. WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.J. OPINION Plaintiff Dorian Pressley filed this action against six police officers ("Defendants"), raising an excessive force claim. This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's appeal of Magistrate Judge Falk's August 20, 2015 Order denying Plaintiff's motion to reopen discovery and compel additional discovery. There was no oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b)

  5. St. Jude Med. v. Volcano Corp.

    Civil Action No. 10-631-RGA (D. Del. Jun. 5, 2012)   Cited 2 times

    Civil Action No. 10-631-RGA 06-05-2012 ST. JUDE MEDICAL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VOLCANO CORPORATION, Defendant. Steven J. Fineman, Esq., Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Delaware; Drew M. Wintringham, Esq. (argued), DLA Piper LLP, New York City, New York; Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Thomas L. Halkowski, Esq., Fish & Richardson, Wilmington, Delaware; Michael M. Rosen, Esq. (argued), Fish & Richardson, San Diego, California; Attorneys for Defendant. ANDREWS MEMORANDUM OPINION Steven J. Fineman

  6. Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 72   Cited 165,875 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order