§Why CasetextPricing

USA v. Winner

RESPONSE

17 Cited authorities

  1. Bryan v. United States

    524 U.S. 184 (1998)   Cited 648 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 924(D) requires knowledge that the conduct is unlawful

  2. U.S. v. Abu-Jihaad

    630 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 211 times
    Holding that there was "no denial of due process in the district court's decision not to order disclosure of FISA materials to the defendant" because disclosure of the FISA materials was not necessary "to assess the legality of the challenged surveillance"

  3. U.S. v. Squillacote

    221 F.3d 542 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 135 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding an inducement to commit a crime by a private party who has no government involvement does not establish an entrapment defense

  4. Gorin v. United States

    312 U.S. 19 (1941)   Cited 132 times
    Holding that "intent or reason to believe" scienter requirement imposed a subjective "bad faith" standard

  5. U.S. v. Morison

    844 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1988)   Cited 100 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the district court did not commit reversible error when it excluded a portion of a defense expert's testimony because, inter alia, three other experts testified to the same issue

  6. United States v. Truong Dinh Hung

    629 F.2d 908 (4th Cir. 1980)   Cited 94 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the term "agent" in Section 951 "is a readily understandable term which provides adequate notice of the conduct proscribed by the statute"

  7. U.S. v. Rosen

    445 F. Supp. 2d 602 (E.D. Va. 2006)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that a court may not consider "factual questions embraced in the general issue" when considering a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment

  8. U.S. v. McGuinness

    764 F. Supp. 888 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)   Cited 39 times
    Holding exclusion of all evidence obtained through electronic intercept order because of inclusion of some irrelevant conversations, even if irrelevant conversations were listened to in their entirety, is not necessary provided investigating law enforcement officers make good faith effort to achieve minimization

  9. United States v. Kim

    808 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that "[t]he Court is not persuaded that § 793(d) is so vague as to permit arbitrary enforcement" and finding the "First Amendment challenge lacked merit"

  10. U.S. v. Abu-Jihaad

    600 F. Supp. 2d 362 (D. Conn. 2009)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that defendants transmittal of national defense information to publisher linked to al Qaeda was insufficient to prove defendant's provision of himself as personnel in absence of evidence as to whether information was provided in response to publisher's request — which would permit finding that defendant had provided himself as personnel — or on defendant's whim — which would not

  11. Section 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

    18 U.S.C. § 793   Cited 193 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Referring to § 793 "for the purpose aforesaid"

  12. Section 794 - Gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government

    18 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 129 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the actual transmission of national defense information