35 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 236,238 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Adickes v. Kress Co.
398 U.S. 144 (1970) Cited 25,043 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983
Giannullo v. City of New York
322 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 2003) Cited 1,302 times
Holding that "unsupported assertions [in a Local Rule 56.1 statement] must . . . be disregarded"
BDO Seidman v. Hirshberg
93 N.Y.2d 382 (N.Y. 1999) Cited 459 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that the legitimate employer interests are limited to "the protection against misappropriation of the employer's trade secrets or of confidential customer lists, or protection from competition by a former employee whose services are unique or extraordinary."
Castle Rock Entertain. v. Carol Publish. Group
150 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 1998) Cited 412 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the fourth factor favored the plaintiffs, who produced a television show, because the defendants, who had produced a trivia book about that show, had entered a market that the plaintiffs might wish to enter
Rogers v. Koons
960 F.2d 301 (2d Cir. 1992) Cited 282 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring a defendant to turn over infringing works "is an equitable remedy issued under the broad powers vested in a trial judge"
Pure Power Boot Camp, Inc. v. Warrior Fitness Boot Camp, LLC
813 F. Supp. 2d 489 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) Cited 141 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that defendants' violation of SCA was neither willful nor intentional because there was no basis to conclude that defendants were "aware of the statute, or knew that their conduct was otherwise unlawful"
Atlas Powder Co. v. E.I. du Pont De Nemours & Co.
750 F.2d 1569 (Fed. Cir. 1984) Cited 240 times 6 Legal Analyses
Finding of enablement is not precluded even if some experimentation is necessary, although the amount of experimentation needed must not be unduly extensive
Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech
80 F.3d 1553 (Fed. Cir. 1996) Cited 135 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding in the context of laches that "[w]ith no legal right to enforce, it cannot be said that Genentech unreasonably delayed during that time period [before FDA approval and launch]."
Estee Lauder Companies Inc. v. Batra
430 F. Supp. 2d 158 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) Cited 73 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding knowledge of "brand strategies" and future product plans was trade secret information
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 328,775 times 158 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Section 101 - Definitions
17 U.S.C. § 101 Cited 6,344 times 174 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886
Section 106 - Exclusive rights in copyrighted works
17 U.S.C. § 106 Cited 3,746 times 107 Legal Analyses
Granting the owners of copyrights in “literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works” the exclusive right “to display the copyrighted work publicly”
Section 501 - Infringement of copyright
17 U.S.C. § 501 Cited 3,164 times 26 Legal Analyses
Granting a cause of action to "[t]he legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright"
Section 154 - Contents and term of patent; provisional rights
35 U.S.C. § 154 Cited 760 times 257 Legal Analyses
Granting twenty years for utility patents
Section 289 - Additional remedy for infringement of design patent
35 U.S.C. § 289 Cited 165 times 73 Legal Analyses
In 35 U.S.C. § 289 infringement is defined as unauthorized manufacture or sale of "the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof".
Section 302 - Duration of copyright: Works created on or after January 1, 1978
17 U.S.C. § 302 Cited 108 times 6 Legal Analyses
Establishing single copyright term

Navajo Air, LLC v. Crye Precision, LLC et al

35 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a private person who conspires with government actors to deprive a plaintiff of her constitutional rights acts "under color of law" for purposes of § 1983

Holding that "unsupported assertions [in a Local Rule 56.1 statement] must . . . be disregarded"

Holding that the legitimate employer interests are limited to "the protection against misappropriation of the employer's trade secrets or of confidential customer lists, or protection from competition by a former employee whose services are unique or extraordinary."

Holding that the fourth factor favored the plaintiffs, who produced a television show, because the defendants, who had produced a trivia book about that show, had entered a market that the plaintiffs might wish to enter

Holding that requiring a defendant to turn over infringing works "is an equitable remedy issued under the broad powers vested in a trial judge"

Holding that defendants' violation of SCA was neither willful nor intentional because there was no basis to conclude that defendants were "aware of the statute, or knew that their conduct was otherwise unlawful"

Finding of enablement is not precluded even if some experimentation is necessary, although the amount of experimentation needed must not be unduly extensive

Holding in the context of laches that "[w]ith no legal right to enforce, it cannot be said that Genentech unreasonably delayed during that time period [before FDA approval and launch]."

Holding knowledge of "brand strategies" and future product plans was trade secret information

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Recognizing the United States' adherence to provisions of the Berne Convention of 1886

Granting the owners of copyrights in “literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works” the exclusive right “to display the copyrighted work publicly”

Granting a cause of action to "[t]he legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright"

Granting twenty years for utility patents

In 35 U.S.C. § 289 infringement is defined as unauthorized manufacture or sale of "the patented design, or any colorable imitation thereof".

Establishing single copyright term