8 Cited authorities

Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Service Co.
499 U.S. 340 (1991) Cited 3,378 times 44 Legal Analyses
Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"
Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, Inc.
464 U.S. 417 (1984) Cited 970 times 27 Legal Analyses
Holding identical copying of videotapes under unique circumstances of case “[did] not have its ordinary effect of militating against a finding of fair use”
Maloney v. T3Media, Inc.
853 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2017) Cited 60 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that arguments that are not presented in appellate briefs are forfeited
UMG Recordings, Inc. v. MP3.com, Inc.
92 F. Supp. 2d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2000) Cited 36 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that allegedly positive impact on plaintiffs' prior market "in no way frees defendant to usurp a further market that directly derives from reproduction of copyrighted works."
Penguin Random House LLC v. Colting
270 F. Supp. 3d 736 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Cited 4 times
17–CV–386 (JSR) 09-07-2017 PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE LLC; Simon & Schuster, Inc.; Alan U. Schwartz as trustee of the Truman Capote Literary Trust ; John Sampas as Literary Representative of the Estate of Jack Kerourac; Nancy Bump; Anthony M. Sampas; John Lash, Executor of the Estate of Jan Kerouac; The Dr. Arthur C. Clarke Trust; Hemingway Copyrights, LLC ; The Patrick Hemingway and Carol T. Hemingway Revocable Living Trust; and The Hemingway Family Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Frederik COLTING and Melissa Medina
Maloney v. T3media, Inc.
94 F. Supp. 3d 1128 (C.D. Cal. 2015) Cited 3 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a right-of-publicity claim based on sale of copyrighted photos of the plaintiffs was preempted
Section 102 - Subject matter of copyright: In general
17 U.S.C. § 102 Cited 2,255 times 120 Legal Analyses
Granting protection to "literary works"
Section 401 - Notice of copyright: Visually perceptible copies
17 U.S.C. § 401 Cited 240 times 3 Legal Analyses
Requiring notice on works published "by authority of the copyright owner"

McNatt v. Prince et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"

Holding identical copying of videotapes under unique circumstances of case “[did] not have its ordinary effect of militating against a finding of fair use”

Holding that arguments that are not presented in appellate briefs are forfeited

Holding that allegedly positive impact on plaintiffs' prior market "in no way frees defendant to usurp a further market that directly derives from reproduction of copyrighted works."

Holding that a right-of-publicity claim based on sale of copyrighted photos of the plaintiffs was preempted

Granting protection to "literary works"

Requiring notice on works published "by authority of the copyright owner"