§Why CasetextPricing

Sacerdote et al v. New York University

MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: 373 MOTION to Strike Document No. [358-1] Declaration of Mark I. Harrison. . Document

27 Cited authorities

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

    509 U.S. 579 (1993)   Cited 26,442 times   228 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a trial judge must ensure that all admitted expert testimony "is not only relevant, but reliable"

  2. Major League Baseball v. Salvino

    542 F.3d 290 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 917 times
    Holding adequate foundation for business records exception laid in similar affidavit

  3. Hangarter v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co.

    373 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2004)   Cited 934 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding a district court did not abuse its discretion in qualifying an insurance expert who testified on similar issues in twelve previous cases and had never been found unqualified

  4. In re McCarthey

    368 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 115 times
    Requiring reasonable factual basis to question the presiding judge's impartiality

  5. Willner v. University of Kansas

    848 F.2d 1023 (10th Cir. 1988)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that a motion to recuse cannot be based exclusively on adverse rulings

  6. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Tourre

    950 F. Supp. 2d 666 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)   Cited 67 times
    Excluding expert with expertise in "general area of structured finance," but no experience in particular industry of collateralized debt obligations

  7. Lippe v. Bairnco Corporation

    288 B.R. 678 (S.D.N.Y. 2003)   Cited 90 times
    Granting motion to exclude expert witnesses where their testimony, inter alia, was “based solely on their say-so”

  8. In re Initial Public Offering Securities Litig.

    174 F. Supp. 2d 61 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)   Cited 58 times
    Denying motion for expert testimony on subject of recusal

  9. Kidder, Peabody Co. v. Iag Intern. Acceptance

    14 F. Supp. 2d 391 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)   Cited 61 times
    Granting motion to preclude expert testimony of law professor who sought to opine that party had acted reasonably and in good faith, holding that these were questions for the jury

  10. Demoulas v. Demoulas

    432 Mass. 43 (Mass. 2000)   Cited 47 times
    Holding that "neither Mass.R.Civ.P. 54(d), nor G.L.c. 261, § 1, [under which plaintiffs moved in that case] expressly authorizes the taxation of trial transcript costs. Nor does any other provision of G.L.c. 261 authorize the taxation of trial transcript expenses except as costs"

  11. Rule 702 - Testimony by Expert Witnesses

    Fed. R. Evid. 702   Cited 26,828 times   260 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the Daubert standard

  12. Section 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge

    28 U.S.C. § 455   Cited 11,105 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Setting forth standards of recusal

  13. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 10,095 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead