21 Cited authorities

  1. Kaufman v. Cohen

    307 A.D.2d 113 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 1,170 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that misrepresentations by one business partner to other partners about the value of a business interest was "essential" to completing the underlying misappropriation of a business opportunity
  2. In re Sharp Intern. Corp.

    403 F.3d 43 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 638 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff must satisfy specific pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) to state actual fraudulent transfer claim under New York law
  3. Simcuski v. Saeli

    44 N.Y.2d 442 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 766 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, where equitable estoppel applies, "burden is on the plaintiff to establish that the action was brought within a reasonable time after the facts giving rise to the estoppel have ceased to be operational"
  4. Caputo v. Pfizer, Inc.

    267 F.3d 181 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 282 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud or concealment provision applies to actions for breach of fiduciary duty in which the underlying action itself sounds in fraud
  5. Johnson v. Proskauer Rose LLP

    129 A.D.3d 59 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 84 times
    Finding plaintiffs adequately alleged fraud where they alleged defendants pressured them into a tax avoidance scheme to preserve a lucrative arrangement with a client
  6. Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Stiles

    315 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 104 times
    Holding that payment of a $5,000 deductible gave the insured an independent interest sufficient to allow the insured to sue for the entire loss
  7. Krupski v. Costa Crociere, S. P.A.

    558 U.S. 1142 (2010)   Cited 13 times
    In Krupski, the plaintiff sought damages for a slip and fall while she was on board a cruise ship and sued Costa Cruise Lines, the entity listed on the front of her cruise ticket.
  8. Prout v. Vladeck

    316 F. Supp. 3d 784 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Dismissing breach of fiduciary duty claim for failure to plead causation and damages where client alleged only that attorney's withholding of case file forced him to resolve his case for "considerably less money than he would otherwise have received"
  9. Prout v. Vladeck

    319 F. Supp. 3d 741 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)   Cited 16 times
    Denying interlocutory appeal because "there is not a substantial ground for difference of opinion on any controlling question of law"
  10. Skadburg v. Gately

    911 N.W.2d 786 (Iowa 2018)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment estops a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense, but does not affect the tolling of a limitations period for the action.
  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 157,606 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  12. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 91,279 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint
  13. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 36,029 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  14. Section 614.1 - Period

    Iowa Code § 614.1   Cited 600 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Noting “[t]his section, as amended by Acts 2017 (87 G.A.) ch. 64, S.F. 413, does not apply to an improvement to real property in existence prior to the effective date of this Act [July 1, 2017]...”
  15. Section 6 - Regulation of futures trading and foreign transactions

    7 U.S.C. § 6   Cited 264 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting futures trades outside contract markets
  16. Section 4.14 - Exemption from registration as a commodity trading advisor

    17 C.F.R. § 4.14   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses

    This section is organized as follows: Paragraph (a) of this section specifies the criteria that must be met to qualify for exemption from registration under this section, including the notice of exemption from registration and continuing obligations of persons who have claimed exemption under paragraph (a)(8) of this section; paragraph (b) of this section concerns "cash market transactions"; and paragraph (c) of this section specifies the effect of registration on a person who has claimed an exemption