86 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 263,477 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 276,716 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. Boyle v. United States

    556 U.S. 938 (2009)   Cited 1,170 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a RICO enterprise "need not have a hierarchical structure or a 'chain of command'; decisions may be made on an ad hoc basis and by any number of methods — by majority vote, consensus, a show of strength, etc."
  4. Menominee Indian Tribe of Wis. v. United States

    577 U.S. 250 (2016)   Cited 868 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "extraordinary circumstances" element for equitable tolling requires evidence of "an external obstacl[e]," which reflects the "requirement that a litigant seeking tolling show that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way "
  5. United States v. Turkette

    452 U.S. 576 (1981)   Cited 2,746 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a RICO enterprise must exist "separate and apart" from the pattern of racketeering activity
  6. Rotella v. Wood

    528 U.S. 549 (2000)   Cited 937 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding RICO claims accrue upon a plaintiff's discovery of their injury, not discovery of Defendants' actions
  7. American Pipe Construction Co. v. Utah

    414 U.S. 538 (1974)   Cited 2,155 times   163 Legal Analyses
    Holding the commencement of a class action "suspends the applicable statute of limitations as to all asserted members of the class who would have been parties had the suit been permitted to continue as a class action"
  8. Koch v. Christie's International PLC

    699 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 1,370 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that discovery accrual rule announced in Rotella continues to be controlling law
  9. Smith v. McGinnis

    208 F.3d 13 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 1,636 times
    Holding that petitioner's pro se status did not merit equitable tolling
  10. Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp.

    12 F.3d 1170 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 1,563 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that fraudulent intent could not be inferred from the defendant entering multiple contracts with a plaintiff and not performing on any of them since "[c]ontractual breach, in and of itself, does not bespeak fraud"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 357,835 times   950 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 15,154 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include
  13. Section 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

    18 U.S.C. § 1343   Cited 12,414 times   173 Legal Analyses
    Barring fraudulent schemes "for obtaining money or property"
  14. Section 1956 - Laundering of monetary instruments

    18 U.S.C. § 1956   Cited 9,603 times   144 Legal Analyses
    Defining “specified unlawful activity” to include, inter alia, controlled substance violations, murder, bribery, smuggling, various forms of fraud, concealment of assets, various environmental offenses, and health care offenses
  15. Section 203 - Method of computing periods of limitation generally

    N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 203   Cited 2,716 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that, in an action commenced by filing, "a claim asserted in the complaint is interposed against the defendant" upon filing
  16. Section 202 - Cause of action accruing without the state

    N.Y. CPLR 202   Cited 594 times
    Limiting the limitations period for causes of action accruing outside of New York where the foreign jurisdiction imposes a shorter statute of limitations than the state does
  17. Section 25 - Private rights of action

    7 U.S.C. § 25   Cited 281 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Granting federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over private claims brought under the CEA
  18. Section 6d - Dealing by unregistered futures commission merchants or introducing brokers prohibited; duties in handling customer receipts; conflict-of-interest systems and procedures; Chief Compliance Officer; rules to avoid duplicative regulations; swap requirements; portfolio margining accounts

    7 U.S.C. § 6d   Cited 124 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting depository institutions from treating customer assets “as belonging to the depositing futures commission merchant or any person other than the customers of such futures commission merchant”
  19. Section 1.20 - Futures customer funds to be segregated and separately accounted for

    17 C.F.R. § 1.20   Cited 17 times
    Requiring the FCM to keep the customer's money in a segregated account and to account for each customer's monies