17 Cited authorities

  1. Asahi Metal Indus. Co. Ltd. v. Superior Court, 480 U.S. 102

    480 U.S. 102 (1987)   Cited 4,244 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in suit by Taiwanese manufacturer for indemnification against Japanese manufacturer, the assertion by California court of personal jurisdiction over Japanese manufacturer was unreasonable
  2. Metzler v. Corinthian

    540 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 660 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs failed to plead loss causation where plaintiffs' theory was that "Corinthian's fraud was revealed to the market, causing Metzler's losses" but "[t]he TAC does not allege that the June 24 and August 2 announcements disclosed—or even suggested—[the fraudulent activities] to the market"
  3. Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC

    616 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2010)   Cited 399 times
    Holding that exercise of personal jurisdiction is reasonable where, inter alia, forum state has an interest "in providing effective means of redress for its residents"
  4. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez

    305 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2002)   Cited 299 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law firm's marketing efforts in New York supported finding personal jurisdiction over a claim arising out of the firm's New York-directed engagement
  5. Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Org.

    835 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2016)   Cited 100 times
    Holding that the due process analyses under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are essentially the same and explaining that courts must consider "the defendant's contacts throughout the United States" where it applies the Fifth Amendment
  6. Charles Schwab Corp. v. Bank of Am. Corp.

    883 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2018)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that Schwab's allegations as to Citibank, HSBC, and JPMorgan Chase could not establish jurisdiction over those banks because the allegations were not sufficiently individualized
  7. Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges

    300 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2004)   Cited 90 times
    Finding non-forum defendants' contacts with the forum — up to ten times per year — insufficient to establish that defendant "transacted business" in forum under D.C. Code § 13-423
  8. Tamam v. Fransabank Sal

    667 F. Supp. 2d 720 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the “mere maintenance of a correspondent account in New York” is insufficient to establish “minimum contacts with the United States”
  9. In re Braskem S.A. Sec. Litig.

    246 F. Supp. 3d 731 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)   Cited 34 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a list of reasons for the low price the defendant had paid for a good was plausibly misleading because it omitted a "key factor, the bribery-affected side deal" with the supplier and therefore amounted to "a classic half-truth"
  10. Matthews v. Brookstone Stores, Inc.

    469 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (S.D. Ala. 2007)   Cited 26 times
    In Stone, the Alabama Supreme Court reaffirmed the proposition that a contractual indemnification provision authorizes recovery of attorney's fees only where "one is defending claims predicated solely upon another defendant's negligence; however, where one is defending for his own benefit, an award of attorney fees will not be allowed."
  11. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 43,965 times   78 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time