24 Cited authorities

Walden v. Fiore
571 U.S. 277 (2014) Cited 4,283 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that “the mere fact that [defendant's] conduct affected plaintiffs with connections to the forum State does not suffice to authorize jurisdiction.”
Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC
616 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2010) Cited 787 times
Holding that a defendant's conduct was purposefully directed toward New York because the defendant offered bags for sale on its website to New York customers and shipped at least one bag to a New York customer
Norton v. Sam's Club
145 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 1998) Cited 1,028 times
Holding that "an argument made only in a footnote [i]s inadequately raised for appellate review," as are arguments made by "merely incorporating by reference an argument presented to the district court" or by "stating an issue without advancing an argument."
Best Van Lines v. Walker
490 F.3d 239 (2d Cir. 2007) Cited 736 times
Holding that we proceed to the constitutional prong of the analysis "[i]f, but only if" we conclude that there is a statutory basis for personal jurisdiction
Charles Schwab Corp. v. Bank of Am. Corp.
883 F.3d 68 (2d Cir. 2018) Cited 338 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Schwab's allegations as to Citibank, HSBC, and JPMorgan Chase could not establish jurisdiction over those banks because the allegations were not sufficiently individualized
Bensusan Restaurant Corporation v. King
126 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 1997) Cited 513 times
Holding that, even if the plaintiff suffered injury in New York, "that does not establish a tortious act in the state of New York within the meaning of § 302"
Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez
305 F.3d 120 (2d Cir. 2002) Cited 421 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court adopted "too narrow of a view" of the relevant contacts with respect to specific jurisdiction, reasoning that, although the contacts "may not have directly given rise to the plaintiff's cause of action, they certainly 'relate to' it"
Waldman v. Palestine Liberation Org.
835 F.3d 317 (2d Cir. 2016) Cited 226 times
Holding that there was no specific jurisdiction in part "because the terror attacks in Israel at issue ... were not expressly aimed at the United States and because the deaths and injuries suffered by the American plaintiffs in these attacks were random and fortuitous"
Leasco Data Processing Equip. Corp v. Maxwell
468 F.2d 1326 (2d Cir. 1972) Cited 319 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that either conduct or effects in the United States may justify the application of Section 10(b) to a securities transaction
Dennis v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
342 F. Supp. 3d 404 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) Cited 64 times
Holding that allowing FLH to join the lawsuit would constitute more than the merely formal change allowed under Rule 17
Rule 4 - Summons
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 Cited 68,659 times 121 Legal Analyses
Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
Section 302 - Personal jurisdiction by acts of non-domiciliaries
N.Y. CPLR 302 Cited 4,202 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"

In re SSA Bonds Antitrust Litigation

24 Cited authorities

Holding that “the mere fact that [defendant's] conduct affected plaintiffs with connections to the forum State does not suffice to authorize jurisdiction.”

Holding that a defendant's conduct was purposefully directed toward New York because the defendant offered bags for sale on its website to New York customers and shipped at least one bag to a New York customer

Holding that "an argument made only in a footnote [i]s inadequately raised for appellate review," as are arguments made by "merely incorporating by reference an argument presented to the district court" or by "stating an issue without advancing an argument."

Holding that we proceed to the constitutional prong of the analysis "[i]f, but only if" we conclude that there is a statutory basis for personal jurisdiction

Holding that Schwab's allegations as to Citibank, HSBC, and JPMorgan Chase could not establish jurisdiction over those banks because the allegations were not sufficiently individualized

Holding that, even if the plaintiff suffered injury in New York, "that does not establish a tortious act in the state of New York within the meaning of § 302"

Holding that the district court adopted "too narrow of a view" of the relevant contacts with respect to specific jurisdiction, reasoning that, although the contacts "may not have directly given rise to the plaintiff's cause of action, they certainly 'relate to' it"

Holding that there was no specific jurisdiction in part "because the terror attacks in Israel at issue ... were not expressly aimed at the United States and because the deaths and injuries suffered by the American plaintiffs in these attacks were random and fortuitous"

Holding that either conduct or effects in the United States may justify the application of Section 10(b) to a securities transaction

Holding that allowing FLH to join the lawsuit would constitute more than the merely formal change allowed under Rule 17

Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time

Holding that service may be made "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by ... mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence"