Riccard v. Prudential Ins. Co.
307 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2002) Cited 359 times
Holding that district court properly broadened injunction in response to plaintiff's attempts to evade filing restrictions by filing complaints in non-judicial forums
Kan. Judicial Watch v. Stout
653 F.3d 1230 (10th Cir. 2011) Cited 39 times
Distinguishing between vacatur on mootness grounds and vacatur as result of an adverse decision on the merits and holding that "the fact that the preliminary injunction was vacated does not deprive [a party] of their status as ‘prevailing parties’ "
Blair v. CBE Group, Inc.
CASE NO. 13cv134-MMA (WVG) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 16, 2014) Cited 13 times
Finding that "courts have recognized that the primary difference between these two rules is that one requires the payment of costs, where the other grants the court discretion in making such a determination"