§Why CasetextPricing

Jones v. Jordan et al

REPLY to Response to Motion re Corrected MOTION for Summary Judgment and Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment.

7 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Place

    462 U.S. 696 (1983)   Cited 3,264 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding 90-minute detention of luggage unreasonable based on nature of interference with person's travels and lack of diligence of police

  2. U.S. v. Digiovanni

    650 F.3d 498 (4th Cir. 2011)   Cited 225 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that traffic stop that lasted approximately fifteen minutes was converted into unlawful seizure because officer prolonged stop solely to investigate drug trafficking activity unrelated to basis for initial stop and not based on reasonable suspicion

  3. U.S. v. Perkins

    363 F.3d 317 (4th Cir. 2004)   Cited 269 times
    Holding that due weight must be given "to common sense judgments reached by officers in light of their experience and training"

  4. Carrero v. Farrelly

    270 F. Supp. 3d 851 (D. Md. 2017)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that, because "the right not to be seized solely on account of one's race is so fundamental," the fact that the Supreme Court stated the rule generally does not stop the right from being clearly established nor fail to put officers on notice

  5. United States v. Pollins

    145 F. Supp. 3d 525 (D. Md. 2015)   Cited 6 times
    In Pollins, Judge Quarles of this Court applied that burden of proof in ruling on evidence from an illegal search under the Fourth Amendment.

  6. Section 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1983   Cited 486,409 times   688 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable any state actor who "subjects, or causes [a person] to be subjected" to a constitutional violation

  7. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,543 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit