30 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 193,992 times   329 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint must contain sufficient facts to "state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face"
  2. Bay Area Laundry v. Ferbar

    522 U.S. 192 (1997)   Cited 500 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a new statute of limitations starts to run with each missed payment or when payment of the debt is accelerated
  3. Armstrong Petroleum v. Tri-Valley Oil Gas

    116 Cal.App.4th 1375 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that monthly payments were divisible from each other and that a new cause of action for breach accrued periodically
  4. Hassler v. Account Brokers of Larimer Cnty., Inc.

    274 P.3d 547 (Colo. 2012)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that acceleration requires a clear, unequivocal act evincing an intent to invoke the creditor's contractual option to accelerate
  5. Interbank Inv. v. Vail Val. W

    12 P.3d 1224 (Colo. App. 2000)   Cited 47 times
    Finding that a material breach "goes to the root of the matter or essence of the contract"
  6. America Production v. Patterson

    185 P.3d 811 (Colo. 2008)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that rule favoring longer, rather than shorter, of two arguably applicable statutes of limitation, like analogous rules of choice applicable to statutes or contractual provisions generally, is a rule of last resort
  7. Portercare Adventist Health Sys. v. Lego

    286 P.3d 525 (Colo. 2012)   Cited 14 times
    In Portercare, the court held that the six year statute of limitations applies to implied in fact contracts for liquidated medical expenses.
  8. Neuromonitoring Assocs. v. Centura Health Corp.

    351 P.3d 486 (Colo. App. 2012)   Cited 12 times

    Court of Appeals No. 11CA1391 08-16-2012 Neuromonitoring Associates, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Centura Health Corporation, Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado, and Portercare Adventist Health System, Defendants-Appellees. Robinson Waters & O'Dorisio, P.C., Steven L. Waters, Brian G. McConaty, Bradley G. Robinson, Kimberly A. Bruetsch, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-Appellant Kutak Rock, LLP, Chad T. Nitta, Mark L. Sabey, Blair E. Kanis, Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellees LOEB City and County

  9. Xenophon Strategies, Inc. v. Jernigan Copeland & Anderson, PLLC

    268 F. Supp. 3d 61 (D.D.C. 2017)   Cited 7 times

    Civil Action No. 15–1774 (RBW) 08-01-2017 XENOPHON STRATEGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. JERNIGAN COPELAND & ANDERSON, PLLC, Defendant. Douglas Chatham Herbert, Jr., Law Office of Douglas C. Herbert, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Samuel Becket Russell, Russell Firm, Washington, DC, for Defendant. REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge Douglas Chatham Herbert, Jr., Law Office of Douglas C. Herbert, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Samuel Becket Russell, Russell Firm, Washington, DC, for Defendant

  10. Rotenberg v. Richards

    899 P.2d 365 (Colo. App. 1995)   Cited 29 times
    Holding quantum meruit claims are "not for a specific, determinable amount" but only for "an amount to be determined by the fact finder" and therefore are "not liquidated or determinable for purposes of § 13–80–103.5"
  11. Section 13-80-101 - General limitation of actions - three years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-101   Cited 148 times
    Stating that "all tort actions for bodily injury or property damage arising out of the use or operation of a motor vehicle . . . shall be commenced within three years" (rearranged)
  12. Section 13-80-108 - When a cause of action accrues

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-108   Cited 128 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining when a cause of action accrues for bodily injury arising out of the use of a motor vehicle
  13. Section 13-80-103 - General limitation of actions - one year

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103   Cited 62 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Requiring that "[a]ll actions for any penalty or forfeiture of any penal statutes" be commenced within one year after the action accrues
  14. Section 13-80-103.5 - General limitation of actions - six years

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-80-103.5   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying six-year statute of limitations to "[a]ll actions to recover a liquidated debt or an unliquidated, determinable amount of money due"