14 Cited authorities

Reed v. Town of Gilbert
576 U.S. 155 (2015) Cited 1,356 times 26 Legal Analyses
Holding that a town's content-based sign regulation failed strict scrutiny because “[t]he Town cannot claim that placing strict limits on temporary directional signs is necessary to beautify the Town while at the same time allowing unlimited numbers of other types of signs that create the same problem”
Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia
515 U.S. 819 (1995) Cited 1,353 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Establishment Clause does not bar disbursement of funds from student activity fees to religious organizations
Romer v. Evans
517 U.S. 620 (1996) Cited 1,273 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding unlawful a state law that precluded local ordinances from protecting homosexuals from discrimination because it "seems inexplicable by anything but animus toward the class it affects"
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
497 U.S. 62 (1990) Cited 1,280 times
Holding that Elrod–Branti doctrine also applies to “promotion, transfer, recall, and hiring decisions”
Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville
508 U.S. 656 (1993) Cited 1,060 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding contractors suing over the set-aside of certain state contracts based on race had standing to advance an equal protection claim because they were "able and ready" to bid on the contracts
Matal v. Tam
137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017) Cited 333 times 78 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Lanham Act's prohibition on disparaging trademarks violates the First Amendment
Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley
408 U.S. 92 (1972) Cited 1,346 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment
Clinton v. City of New York
524 U.S. 417 (1998) Cited 514 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that "the power to enact statutes may only be exercised in accord with a single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered, procedure" outlined in Article I
Ariz. State Legislature v. Ariz. Indep. Redistricting Comm'n
576 U.S. 787 (2015) Cited 287 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a claim that a proposition interfered with the Legislature's constitutionally vested power over redistricting established standing
U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton
514 U.S. 779 (1995) Cited 347 times
Holding that "a state amendment" regulating ballot access "is unconstitutional when it has the likely effect of handicapping a class of candidates and has the sole purpose of creating additional qualifications indirectly"

Common Cause et al v. Rucho et al

14 Cited authorities

Holding that the Establishment Clause does not bar disbursement of funds from student activity fees to religious organizations

Holding unlawful a state law that precluded local ordinances from protecting homosexuals from discrimination because it "seems inexplicable by anything but animus toward the class it affects"

Holding that Elrod–Branti doctrine also applies to “promotion, transfer, recall, and hiring decisions”

Holding contractors suing over the set-aside of certain state contracts based on race had standing to advance an equal protection claim because they were "able and ready" to bid on the contracts

Holding that the Lanham Act's prohibition on disparaging trademarks violates the First Amendment

Holding a law was content-based where it prohibited nonlabor-related picketing at a place of employment

Holding that "the power to enact statutes may only be exercised in accord with a single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered, procedure" outlined in Article I

Holding that a claim that a proposition interfered with the Legislature's constitutionally vested power over redistricting established standing

Holding that "a state amendment" regulating ballot access "is unconstitutional when it has the likely effect of handicapping a class of candidates and has the sole purpose of creating additional qualifications indirectly"