§Why CasetextPricing

Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.

ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re MOTION to Extend Technical Expert Report Deadlines

3 Cited authorities

  1. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Check Point Software Techs. Ltd.

    215 F. Supp. 3d 314 (D. Del. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    C.A. No. 10–1067–LPS C.A. No. 12–1581–LPS 04-14-2014 INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, Plaintiff, v. CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Check Point Software Technologies, Inc., McAfee, Inc., Symantec Corp., Trend Micro Incorporated, and Trend Micro, Inc. (USA), Defendants. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Plaintiff, v. Trend Micro Incorporated, and Trend Micros, Inc. (USA) Defendants. Joseph J. Farnan, III, Brian E. Farnan, FARNAN LLP, Wilmington, DE., Parker C. Folse III, Brooke A.M. Taylor, Lindsey

  2. Union Carbide Chems. Plastics Tech. Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.

    270 F. Supp. 2d 519 (D. Del. 2003)   Cited 5 times
    Denying the admission of supplemental reports when the case was on remand, the expert discovery period was closed, and it would cause substantial prejudice because admitting the evidence would require considerable additional discovery

  3. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 33,677 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)