United States v. Gurr
471 F.3d 144 (D.C. Cir. 2006) Cited 31 timesHolding in the context of the border search exception that "[t]he distinction that [plaintiff] would draw between contraband and documentary evidence of a crime is without legal basis"
United States v. Baker
693 F.2d 183 (D.C. Cir. 1982) Cited 68 timesFinding that if there was Winship error, it was not plain
Boca Investerings Partnership v. United States
128 F. Supp. 2d 16 (D.D.C. 2000) Cited 6 timesNo. CIV. A. 97-0602 (PLF). December 22, 2000 Melvin White, Diane L. Cafritz, Christopher Kliefoth, William L. Goldman, Karla Palmer, McDermott Will Emery, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs. Darren D. Farfante, Michael J. Salem, Samuel Alvin Mitchell, Thomas P. Holderness, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Richard L. Gilman, Papermaster Weltmann, Landover, MD, for Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs' motion in limine to exclude
Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness
Fed. R. Evid. 803 Cited 12,662 times 85 Legal AnalysesRecognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities