16 Cited authorities

  1. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro

    138 S. Ct. 1134 (2018)   Cited 181 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption applied to each listed activity in a provision individually where the activities were joined in the list by "or"
  2. Thiessen v. Gen. Elec. Capital Corp.

    267 F.3d 1095 (10th Cir. 2001)   Cited 841 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding as long as the EEOC and the company are aware of the nature and scope of the allegations, the purposes behind the administrative filing requirement are satisfied and no injustice or contravention of congressional intent occurs by allowing piggybacking
  3. Dole v. Snell

    875 F.2d 802 (10th Cir. 1989)   Cited 88 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this factor supported employee status because earnings had not depended on the workers' "judgment or initiative"
  4. Avery v. Chariots for Hire

    748 F. Supp. 2d 492 (D. Md. 2010)   Cited 37 times
    Dismissing claim for wages for pre-trip cleaning inspections where plaintiffs have not alleged that they were not paid the statutory minimum wage for each of the total number of hours they worked
  5. Troy v. Kehe Food Distribs. Inc.

    276 F.R.D. 642 (W.D. Wash. 2011)   Cited 32 times
    Considering the plaintiff's credibility in determining whether the plaintiff's claims were typical of the class
  6. McMaster v. E. Armored Servs., Inc.

    780 F.3d 167 (3d Cir. 2015)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee who drove in a mixed fleet was entitled to overtime protection even though she drove small vehicles only a minority of the time
  7. Green v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.

    888 F. Supp. 2d 1088 (D. Kan. 2012)   Cited 28 times
    In Green and Knott, the plaintiffs shared the same job title and many of the same responsibilities. Nonetheless, the differences in their respective job duties were sufficient to warrant decertification of the collective action class.
  8. Buckner v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

    No. 5:09-CV-411-BR (E.D.N.C. May. 7, 2012)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that the plaintiff remained exempt under the MCA because "he regularly operated [non-commercial vehicles] throughout the course of his employment with UPS."
  9. Blair v. Transam Trucking, Inc.

    309 F. Supp. 3d 977 (D. Kan. 2018)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that Plaintiffs' class KWPA claim was duplicative of Plaintiffs' FLSA claim and therefore preempted by the FLSA
  10. Aquilino v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.

    Civil Action No.: 04-04100 (PGS) (D.N.J. Feb. 15, 2011)   Cited 14 times
    Summarizing history
  11. Section 216 - Penalties

    29 U.S.C. § 216   Cited 12,829 times   110 Legal Analyses
    Vesting enforcement power in Secretary of Labor
  12. Section 3121 - Definitions

    26 U.S.C. § 3121   Cited 513 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Excluding from FICA's definition of wages remuneration above "the [FICA] contribution and benefit base (as determined under section 230 of the Social Security Act)"