§Why CasetextPricing

Austin v. Salinas et al

RESPONSE to Motion re MOTION to Substitute Party

4 Cited authorities

  1. Neeley v. Grainger Cnty. Gov't

    No.: 3:15-CV-180-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 28, 2017)

    No.: 3:15-CV-180-TAV-HBG 02-28-2017 JANE NEELEY and RAY NEELEY, Plaintiffs, v. GRAINGER COUNTY GOVERNMENT, BEAN STATION MUNICIPALITY, and NATHAN COOK, individually, Defendants. Thomas A. Varlan CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION This civil action is before the Court on the following motions: (1) defendant Bean Station Municipality's ("Bean Station") Motion to Dismiss Claims Brought by Jane Neeley [Doc. 16]; (2) plaintiff Ray Neeley's Motion to Substitute Party [Doc. 20]; (3) defendant

  2. Dubuc v. Green Oak Tp.

    958 F. Supp. 1231 (E.D. Mich. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    In Dubuc, the plaintiff claimed that the defendants acted against their property development to retaliate against him for exercising his First Amendment rights against the defendant Township.

  3. Deal v. Polk County, Tennessee

    No. 1:03-cv-385 (E.D. Tenn. May. 8, 2007)   Cited 4 times

    No. 1:03-cv-385. May 8, 2007 MEMORANDUM R. EDGAR, Chief Judge Plaintiff Jonathan T. Deal brings this civil rights action against Defendants Polk County, Tennessee, Sheriff Bill Davis, Deputy Sheriff James T. Burris, Deputy Carl Browne, and Bob Copeland, jail administrator, (collectively "Defendants") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ("Section 1983"), 42 U.S.C. § 1985 ("Section 1985"), and 18 U.S.C. § 245. Plaintiff also raises various state law claims, including claims for assault, battery, and negligence

  4. Rule 25 - Substitution of Parties

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 25   Cited 10,694 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Providing for the automatic substitution at the district-court level of public officers sued in their official capacities